Search for: "Goode v. Ford Motor Co" Results 61 - 80 of 231
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2007, 6:02 am
Ford Motor Co., 113 P.3d 82, 94-95 (Cal. 2005) (rejecting "aggregate disgorgement"); Engle v. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 7:34 am
Ford Motor Co. (1964) 61 Cal.2d 256 (Vandermark), reasoning, “Retailers like manufacturers are engaged in the business of distributing goods to the public. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
American Honda Motor Co., 505 So.2d 358, 361 (Ala. 1987) (cited in Deere). [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 12:40 am
The challenge to secure registration is even greater because slogans are often treated merely as a form of advertisement rather than a source identifier (indeed, this might be the case even if the hashtag-based mark includes a well-known registered mark).Trade marks go socialPerhaps there is another way to view hashtag marks such as those above, based on the approach suggested by Judge Kozinski of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.In Plasticolor Molded Products v Ford… [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:21 am by Carolina Attorneys
The trial court also found: “Wife is an interested party acting in good faith with insufficient means to defray costs and expenses of suit and is entitled to an award of attorney’s fees. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 8:12 am by Rebecca Tushnet
That’s like saying that, because Ford Motor Co. has published corporate histories in its name, sponsors Masterpiece Theater, and creates extensive social media content, “Ford Motor Company” is now a title for Rogers purposes, or that the existence of The Texas Rangers: The Authorized History or The Code: An Authorized History of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Codemakes those entities into titles for Rogers purposes. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 10:48 am
See 2007 WL 2493917, at *2-3, 9 (describing intricacies of third-party payer formulary procedures).That's good, but it gets better. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 12:29 pm
Ford Motor Co., 922 S.W.2d 572 (Tex. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 10:05 am
Ford Motor Co., 113 P.3d 82, 94-95 (Cal. 2005) (applying Campbell to reject "aggregate disgorgement"); Engle v. [read post]