Search for: "Government Employees Insurance Co. v. Smith" Results 61 - 80 of 90
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2010, 11:26 am by Michael Thomas
Smith JJ.A.This is a companion appeal to Insurance Co. of the State of Pennsylvania v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 3:23 am
(f/k/a Insurance Corporation of Hannover) and Clarendon Insurance Group Inc., and their reinsurer, American Constantine Insurance Co., the U.S. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 2:03 pm by Charles Morrison
  However, the court does consider the SS benefits when making an equitable division of retirement benefits overall – See Smith v. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm by smtaber
— Ross Douthat, The New York Times, December 9, 2009 In his column today, my colleague Thomas Friedman argues eloquently for a Dick Cheney-esque, “one percent doctrine” approach to climate change, which would treat caps on greenhouse emissions as a rational way to “buy insurance” against a potentially catastrophic outcome. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 9:46 pm
Nonetheless, the Department of Education and Training wholly rejects those allegations.You have also implied that the Department of Education and Training may engage in recriminations towards your wife, who is a teacher in the Territory, an employee of the department, and who has no involvement in Mr Boutsis' case. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
- Amsterdam Court of Appeal rules in favour of Hachette Filipacchi Press, publisher of Elle magazine, in trade name/trade mark infringement litigation brought by clothing company WE Netherlands (Class 46)   Poland District Administrative Court in Warsaw: ALDO S and ALDI not similar (Class 46)   South Africa More on the Springbok emblem (Afro-IP)   Sweden Appeal Court rules on reproduction of album cover artwork in case against Åhléns (International… [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
Shell Oil Co., 2 Cal.3d 245, 251 (1970). [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm
Wheeler, No. 07-1816 Conviction and sentence for embezzling, stealing or otherwise converting employee contributions to a company's health insurance and 401(k) funds in violation of 18 U.S.C. sections 669 and 664, are affirmed over claims that the district court: 1) erred in defining the mens rea element of the offense under section 669; 2) admitted impermissible prior act evidence in violation of Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b); and 3) imposed an enhancement that lacked… [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Co., No. 06-60991 In an action involving coverage for a myriad acts of theft over almost a decade under policies issued by defendant which protect plaintiff from employee theft, summary judgment for insurer is affirmed where, contrary to plaintiff's claim, the losses it suffered over a period of ten years constituted a single occurrence even though the scheme spanned multiple policy periods. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included:Forbes interview with M Meurer (co author of ‘Patent Failure’): (Patent Prospector), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (IAM), (Technological Innovation and Intellectual Property), (Patent Prospector),Rambus – Rambus stock soars following jury’s dismissal of antitrust and fraud charges from Hynix, Micron, and Nanya… [read post]