Search for: "Government Employees Insurance Company v. United States of America"
Results 61 - 80
of 170
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2017, 7:38 am
He talked David into being the Libertarian vice presidential candidate in 1980, because he was too busy running the family company to do it.) [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 9:01 pm
In such cases, the cost would be passed from the employer to the insurer, which would, in turn, be reimbursed by the government for any contraception provided to employees covered by the exempt plan. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm
First, in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 3:50 am
That employee may be: An accidental insider (e.g. an inattentive employee infiltrated due to inadvertent behaviors or broken business processes); A compromised insider (e.g. a targeted employee via social engineering and infiltrated due to malware infections or stolen credentials); or A malicious insider (e.g. a so-called bad leaver or criminal insider who infiltrate via corporate espionage and sabotage). [read post]
10 May 2017, 10:20 am
The SHOP Marketplace is intended to offer an opportunity for for small employers who want to provide health and dental insurance to their employees. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 3:21 pm
See, Businesses Must Confirm & Clean Up Health Plan ACA & Other Compliance Following Supreme Court’s King v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 4:38 pm
As has been the case with other companies caught up in Brazilian corruption scandal, JBS, whose Level 1 ADRs trade over-the-counter in the U.S., has now been hit with a follow-on securities class action lawsuit in the United States. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 7:02 am
Dean v. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 2:18 pm
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America et al. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 7:35 am
That means that longstanding precedent, such as Roe v. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 7:52 am
Kessler, professor of law and legal history at Stanford University, “While the [1925 Federal Arbitration Act] was initially envisioned as applying primarily to disputes between commercial equals, since the 1980s, the United States Supreme Court has interpreted it in ways that have facilitated corporate America’s efforts to force consumers and employees into arbitration. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 8:41 am
Petitioners also state that separate "insurance cards" are necessary. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:36 pm
In 1968, a court decision, Escott v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm
The government response was the enactment of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, which created the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and made financial reporting obligatory for public corporations. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 7:54 am
Greater Houston Transportation Company v. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 7:28 pm
Most all agree that the United States Supreme Court will ultimately decide the question of the legitimacy of the Rule. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 3:07 pm
It is a high-stakes sequel to the 2014 ruling giving some for-profit companies an exemption from that mandate, and it probably will further clarify church-state relationships in America. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 6:36 am
The Facts of the Case In the case of Colonial County Mutual Insurance Company v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am
Fifth Circuit United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 6:00 am
Life Insurance Company of North America 15-163Issue: Whether the amount of a remedy based on the improper delay in the payment of a benefit should be based on: (1) only the amount needed to redress the loss that the beneficiary sustained as a result of the wrongful delay (the rule in the Sixth Circuit); (2) either the amount needed to redress the loss that the beneficiary sustained as a result of the wrongful delay or the amount needed to disgorge any gain improperly… [read post]
