Search for: "Graham v. District of Columbia"
Results 61 - 80
of 124
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2010, 1:10 am
District Court S D New York decision in International Swaps and Derivatives Association Inc v Socratek LLC (Trademark Blog) District Court E D Pennsylvania: Prejudgement interest granted on old ‘secret’ infringements: Graham v Haughney (Copyright Litigation Blog) US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps Omega - Supreme Court: The ‘First Sale’ Rule: Costco Wholesale Corp. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 5:30 am
Although they differ slightly in their particulars, they have the same basic structure: Both bills would allow a Special Counsel terminated under §600.7(d) to challenge his termination before a “three-judge” D.C. district court (which would include two federal district judges for the District of Columbia and one judge from the U.S. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 4:00 pm
Covington 17-1364 Issues: (1) Whether the district court had jurisdiction to consider challenges to the new districting plan the North Carolina General Assembly enacted after North Carolina’s previous state districting plan was invalidated as a racial gerrymander; (2) whether the district court erred by finding that four districts were racially gerrymandered even though the legislature did not consider race; (3) whether the district… [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 4:09 pm
The three Republican judges on the emoluments panel decision were: Paul V. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 12:16 pm
North Carolina, and Graham v. [read post]
28 Apr 2018, 12:23 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 9:05 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia ruled that President Barack Obama’s decision to expand the Cascade-Siskiyou National Monument in Oregon was unlawful. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 7:36 am
Box 1406 Columbia, SC 29202 Phone: (803) 737-0391; (800) 436-8190 (V/TTY/Toll Free) Fax: (803) 737-0140 E-mail: rratterree@sces.org Web: http://www.sces.org/es/specgrp.htm South Carolina Speech To Speech Relay Service Phone: (800) 735-7277 (Toll Free) ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY Technology-Related Assistance SC Assistive Technology Project USC, School of Medicine-Center for Disability Resources 8301 Farrow Road Columbia, SC 29208 Phone: (803) 935-5340 Fax:… [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 9:03 pm
Binz and Graham concluded that this correlation indicated that the Act increased “the value of mandatory accounting disclosures to investors. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
Fifth Avenue Chrysler Center, Inc,, 454 P.2d 244, 247 (Alaska 1969).ArizonaNo Arizona court has directly passed on innovator liability, but the federal district court in the Darvocetlitigation twice held that the theory was incompatible with Arizona law. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 9:00 pm
The participants, selected from a large applicant pool representing all six law schools in the Historically Black Colleges and Universities Law School Consortium (HBCULSC), are: Jai’Ehir Jackson-Hawkins and Veronica Alba, Florida A&M University College of Law Morigan Tuggle, Lauren Fleming and Favour Okhuevbie, Howard University School of Law Zaria Graham and Larry Futrell, North Carolina Central University School of Law Qwantaria Russell, Tatiyana Brown-Harper, Skylar Dean,… [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 10:24 am
Courts of Appeals for the 1st, 10th and District of Columbia Circuits, the answer is “no. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 12:00 am
Graham and R. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 11:57 am
Supreme Court held in Powell v. [read post]
20 Jun 2020, 3:01 pm
Litton Indus., Inc., 410 Mass. 15, 23 (1991); Columbia State Bank v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. [read post]
12 May 2019, 4:36 pm
Canada In the case of Zoutman v Graham 2019 ONSC 2834, the Ontario Superior Court granted summary judgment for general and aggravated damages in the sum of $50,000 to a doctor defamed on a website known as RateMDs.com. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 7:26 am
While the Supreme Court stated in its 2010 decision, Graham v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 8:19 am
(relisted after the September 26, October 7, October 14, October 28, November 4, November 10 and November 22 conferences; as we said two weeks ago and the week before that, it seems like we should be getting an opinion in this case soon) District of Columbia v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 6:11 am
District Court Judge John Sirica on March 1, 1974. [read post]
