Search for: "Grant V. Barrett"
Results 61 - 80
of 778
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm
Trump v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
To be sure, in Biden v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 1:44 pm
(NA)Today the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Devillier v. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 9:30 pm
Mark Graber disputes the significance of the latest discovery of Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman related to whether the President is an Office of the United States for purposes of Section 3 of the fourteenth Amendment (Balkinization).ICYMI: The failed attempt to rename Brown v. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 7:31 am
Introduction The Supreme Court heard argument last month in Moore v. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 3:08 am
Others are still awaiting oral argument or a decision on whether to grant a hearing at all. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 11:14 pm
[This post is co-authored with Seth Barrett Tillman] On Friday, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Trump v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 11:59 am
"] On Friday, January 5, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Trump v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 8:24 am
The Barrett v. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:50 pm
Worley] [This post is co-authored with Seth Barrett Tillman] Recently, James Heilpern and Michael T. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 7:09 am
Supreme Court, Colorado Republican State Central Committee v. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
In the district court, a careful judge excluded the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses, who relied heavily upon animal studies and who cherry picked and distorted the available epidemiology.[9] The Court of Appeals reversed, in an unsigned, non-substantive opinion that interjected an asymmetric standard of review.[10] After granting review, the Supreme Court engaged with the substantive validity issues passed over by the intermediate appellate court. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Thirty years before Dobbs, the Supreme Court decided Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
16 Dec 2023, 8:58 pm
Or maybe Justice Barrett simply decided that the Court should not grant the case, because Roe v. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 12:17 pm
But Justices Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett votes to grant cert. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 6:03 am
Ass’n v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 10:56 am
In Barrett v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 10:22 am
And I suspect Justice Barrett will be with him. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 12:41 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman]. [read post]
