Search for: "Grant et al v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency et al"
Results 61 - 80
of 152
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2008, 10:30 pm
Issue: Whether the Environmental Protection Agency correctly issued a permit allowing discharges from a copper mine into a water body identified as impaired by the state of Arizona. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 8:13 pm
., Nov. 2, 2018, case no. 18A410); -Kelsey Cascadia Rose Juliana, et al. v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 11:47 pm
Lamar Smith et al. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 1:45 pm
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)] Administrator Pruitt leaving chlorpyrifos tolerances in effect when he did not and cannot determine that chlorpyrifos is safe under the Food Quality Protection Act. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 7:07 am
Environmental Protection Agency. [read post]
17 Sep 2012, 1:45 am
Friends of Blackwater, et al. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 3:48 pm
Center For Biological Diversity, et al. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 4:15 pm
District Court for the Eastern District of California granted summary judgment for the Plaintiffs in National Association of Wheat Growers et. al. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Brown and David Matusow, Bahr, et al. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 3:00 am
Donald Glaser et al., 937 F.3d 1191 (9th Cir. 2019), on remand, 2020 U.S. [read post]
Ninth Circuit Simultaneously Denies Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice and Grants Motion to Expedit
4 Jan 2018, 10:51 am
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Administrator Pruitt (Respondents) to dismiss the case for lack of jurisdiction while granting a motion by League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC), et al. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
Supreme Court in Decker v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 10:58 am
Environmental Protection Agency et al. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 10:58 am
Environmental Protection Agency et al. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 10:58 am
Environmental Protection Agency et al. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 3:00 am
California et al. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am
AL., FEDERAL PRACTICE & PROCEDURE: EVIDENCE §5501 (1st ed.) [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
§9601 et seq. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 9:41 am
Connecticut, et al., 582 F.3d 309 (2nd Cir. 2009). [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 2:05 pm
U.S., 07-776), and it refused to hear an appeal by five Washington, D.C., residents who had wanted to take part in the challenge to the city’s ban on handgun possession (Parker, et al., v. [read post]
