Search for: "Grant v. Department of Corrections" Results 61 - 80 of 3,032
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2024, 4:00 am by Peter J. Sluka
Rosiny v Schmidt, where the First Department reversed the trial court’s finding that a mandatory book value buyout provision was unconscionable (185 AD2d 727 [1st Dept 1992]). [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 12:34 pm by John Elwood
The court also denied review in a case in which the Missouri Department of Corrections claimed it had been deprived of a fair trial in an employment discrimination case because the judge struck potential jurors who had religious objections to homosexuality. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:16 am by Amy Howe
In a statement regarding the denial of review, Alito agreed that, for procedural reasons, the court was correct to turn down the department’s petition. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 9:08 am by Howard Friedman
Today the Supreme Court denied review in Missouri Department of Corrections v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
On the contrary, all of them apparently took for granted that he was one of the officers of the United States to which Article VI refers. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 1:44 pm by Kalvis Golde
Bradley, Sands asks the justices to grant review and reverse the 9th Circuit’s ruling. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 11:53 am by Phil Dixon
The plaintiff was an inmate at Avery-Mitchell Correctional Institution in the Western District of North Carolina. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 3:44 pm by Michael Lowe
  See, “Illegal Alien” Is One of Many Correct Legal Terms for “Illegal Immigrant,” written by Alex Nowrasteh and published by Cato on October 14, 2019. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
Alabama Department of Corrections officials struggled for nearly two hours to insert an IV for administering the lethal drug, a process that typically should have taken up to six minutes, or a maximum of 30 minutes in extreme cases. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 5:04 am by Guest Author
  If that question is asked, the correct answer with respect to this statute is: not a lot. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
” IPSO 20214-23 Lunn v The Jewish Chronicle, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach: sanction – publication of correction 20293-23 Mendes v Western Mail, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 20606-23 White v The Sunday Telegraph, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation Statements in open court and apologies We are not aware of any statements in open court or apologies in the last week. [read post]