Search for: "Grant v. Maine Department of Corrections"
Results 61 - 80
of 322
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Sep 2008, 5:42 pm
Fry ("Fry") appeals from the trial court's order entering a default judgment in favor of Defendant-Appellee Indiana Department of Correction ("DOC"). [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 8:52 am
Yeaples v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 10:00 am
The hearing officer refused and the writ was granted quashing the the final order upholding the suspension and remanding it back to the Department to correct their error (new hearing) – which means, of course, that the cost of the error will be born by the defendant. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 8:36 am
", in the way that experienced bankruptcy attorneys would.The result reached by the majority was clearly and obviously the correct result. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 11:06 pm
The Appellant's main request is that the decision under appeal be set aside and that the patent application be remitted to the Examining Division for further prosecution (see statement of grounds of appeal, letter dated 8 August 2017).As an auxiliary request, the Appellant requests that a patent be granted on the basis of the claims presently on file.The Appellant further requests that the appeal fee be refunded.In the event that the main request is granted,… [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 5:42 am
Addressing “important issues about employer liability for a hostile work environment created by third parties and about non-employer liability for employment related discrimination” under state law, the First Circuit, reversing in large part the decision of the court below, finding a reasonable jury could conclude that a nurse employed by Correct Care Solutions (CCS) at a Maine Department of Corrections (MDOC) prison endured a hostile work environment… [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 10:31 pm
In the case of FCC v. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 8:53 am
The judgment of the Supreme Court Lady Hale gave the main judgment in the Supreme Court. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Ultimately, of course, the Supreme Court vacated the Trump administration’s rescission of DACA in 2020 when—by a 5-4 margin, with Chief Justice John Roberts writing for the majority—it decided Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
6 Sep 2008, 2:00 pm
The main reason CAAF appears to do so is to open the door to the Supremes. [read post]
28 May 2010, 3:36 pm
Judge Clevert was persuaded by plaintiffs' experts in Donna Dawn Konitzer's case that the arguments being made by the Department of Corrections were not sufficient to justify granting summary judgment to the state - with the exception noted above about the searches. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 6:14 am
The cases include Association for Molecular Pathology v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 12:18 pm
However, caselaw confirms that welfare is still ‘a primary consideration’ (ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] 2 AC 166, [2011] UKSC 4), so it’s going to be a pretty important factor in any consideration of publication, and in many cases it will be determinative. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 7:03 pm
Argument Preview In Arizona v. [read post]
3 Jan 2021, 7:14 pm
That is the main take away from SGS Sports, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am
(Attachments: # 1 Corrected Complaint, # 2 Corrected Motion and Memorandum for Temporary Restraining Order)(Gupta, Deepak) (Entered: 11/27/2017)11/27/2017Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Timothy J. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am
(Attachments: # 1 Corrected Complaint, # 2 Corrected Motion and Memorandum for Temporary Restraining Order)(Gupta, Deepak) (Entered: 11/27/2017)11/27/2017Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Timothy J. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 4:10 am
This Kat recently had an opportunity revisit the patent decision given by the United States Supreme Court on 20 March in Mayo Collaborative Services v Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. [read post]
8 May 2007, 9:02 am
If granted, this capital case could be OT2007's Limtiaco v. [read post]
24 Aug 2008, 9:18 am
CAAF should grant review of Bush II and use it as a vehicle to correct its analytic mistake in Allende. [read post]
