Search for: "Grant v. Maxwell"
Results 61 - 80
of 212
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2016, 6:33 am
Baze v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 4:29 am
Here are the materials in Matt v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 7:25 am
State v. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 6:05 pm
Lee v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 7:18 am
Riley v. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 3:09 pm
Publius would recognize the various themes that are the subject of essays in Part V of this Handbook (Mark Brandon, Oren Gross, Wayne Moore, David Strauss, Ernest Young, John Dinan, Jamal Green, Gerard Magliocca, Vicki Jackson, Heinz Klug, Elizabeth Beaumont, Maxwell Stearns, Paul Kahn). [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 4:34 pm
The case of Gulati v MGN Ltd [2015] EWHC 1482 (Ch), to which the attention of this blog’s readers has already been drawn here, is a complex but important case. [read post]
17 May 2015, 1:08 am
The view that reputation alone, without customers in the UK, is not enough for a passing off claim dates back to Maxwell v Hogg (1867) LR2 Ch 307 (which involved a claim for passing off where the plaintiff had advertised though had not yet sold the product). [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 11:05 am
In Velasquez v. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 7:19 am
His GINA claim also advanced because neither party sufficiently briefed the issues of whether the doctor who performed a physical was an “agent” of the employer, whether the employer’s receipt of his medical form was inadvertent, and whether the information was actually “genetic information” as defined under GINA (Maxwell v Verde Valley Ambulance Co, Inc, September 10, 2014, Bade, B). [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 4:14 am
On August 5, 2010, after the state court litigation commenced, a claims representative for the insurer sent counsel for Davis and Maxwell a letter stating that in light of the policy’s Insured v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 9:55 am
Colorado (No. 13-7768) Maxwell v. [read post]
30 May 2014, 6:31 am
North Carolina, 13-504; Maxwell v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:44 am
North Carolina, 13-504; Maxwell v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 6:40 am
Maxwell two years ago. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 5:25 pm
RUTAN, Appellant, v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
The court granted the motion, saying “Although copyright is a strict liability statute, there should still be some element of volition or causation which is lacking where a defendant&rs [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 11:19 am
Merck KGaA v Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp & Others, a Chancery Division, England and Wales, ruling last week from Mr Justice Nugee [don't ask: the Kats haven't come across him either, but he is a Chancery judge], addressed an important preliminary issue. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 7:19 am
The decision, People v.... [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 4:30 am
In Ross v. [read post]
