Search for: "Grant v. State of Wisconsin" Results 61 - 80 of 1,204
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2016, 8:25 am by David Strifling
DNR, the Wisconsin Supreme Court expansively interpreted the doctrine as a valid basis for DNR to consider whether to grant, conditionally grant, or deny a high capacity well permit based on the well’s impact on other waters of the state.[3] However, several recent developments highlighted by a legislative hearing earlier this week seem to indicate that in Wisconsin, unlike other states, the relative strength of the public trust doctrine is… [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:27 am
" Those include the ability to divorce and share marital property.Moreover, in Jayne Dunnum v Dept of Employee Trust Funds, Wisconsin's Dane County Circuit Court ruled (at page 28) that the new law does not violate the state's "super DOMA" amendment.Nevertheless, on behalf of Wisconsin Family Action, the Alliance Defense Fund has petitioned the Wisconsin Supreme Court to rule that the new law violates Art. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 6:24 am
In Jayne Dunnum v Dept of Employee Trust Funds, Wisconsin's Dane County Circuit Court ruled (at page 28) that the new law does not violate the state's "super DOMA" amendment. [read post]
12 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
But the Court’s breakdown in the Wisconsin case—Republican National Committee (RNC) v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 7:39 am
Below you will find the UCP affiliates for Wisconsin: UCP of Greater Dane County 1502 Greenway Cross Madison, WI 53713 Phone: (608) 273-4434 Fax: (608) 273-3426 E-mail: camilla@ucpdane.org Web: http://www.ucpdane.org UCP of North Central Wisconsin 740 North Third Street Wausau, WI 54403 Phone: (715) 842-8700; (800) 472-4408 (Toll Free) Fax: (715) 848-3511 E-mail: kbreitenfeldt@ucp-wausau.org Web: http://www.ucp-wausau.org UCP of Southeastern Wisconsin 7519 West… [read post]
12 Sep 2020, 1:43 pm by Matt Cooper
Hobbs, the district court granted plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction, requiring the state to extend the time for voters to provide missing signatures on their mail-in ballots. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:34 am by Michael C. Dorf
ISL posits that this provision grants the power to draw districts to state legislatures--independent of state high court review. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 8:12 am
The Wisconsin Supreme Court recently held in Casper v. [read post]