Search for: "Gray v. Administrative Director of Court"
Results 61 - 80
of 101
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2009, 11:49 pm
Duffy indicated that the Supreme Court (where he once clerked) was not as familiar with patent law as it was with administrative law, and therefore, the Court would likely defer to the USPTO with respect to its interpretation of 35 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Nov 2022, 3:06 pm
Her colleagues adopted her views in their opinion for the Court last month in Consumer Financial Services v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:13 am
The courts have stressed that, to give proper protection for responsible journalism, the defence must be applied in a practical and workable manner: Bonnick v Morris [2003] 1 AC 300 PC; Harper v Seaga [2009] 1 AC 1 PC. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 11:51 am
A ruling changing this “could be the Brown v. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 9:30 am
Book Chapters: Rishi Batra, Integrative v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 6:25 am
In addition, the court recognized overlapping Fourteenth Amendment claims for the same conduct (acknowledging the gray area and uncertainty in which various constitutional rights and liberties interact). [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 9:30 pm
In addition, the court recognized overlapping Fourteenth Amendment claims for the same conduct (acknowledging the gray area and uncertainty in which various constitutional rights and liberties interact). [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 9:46 pm
SCA 89 of 2008Judge: Higgins CJ, Gray and Refshauge JJSupreme Court of the ACTDate: 11 September 2009IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE ) ) No. [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 4:08 pm
Open Justice and Court Reporting On 22 June 2016, in the case of London Borough of Sutton v Gray & Ors v Guardian News and Media Ltd [2016] EWHC 1608 (Fam) Pauffley J dismissed an application by the media for publication of the judgment of King J concerning the case of the murdered child, Ellie Butler. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 4:00 am
One case that comes to mind is Mehraban v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 5:00 am
(ITC 337 Law Blog) What every transactional counsel should know – consequences of missing provisions in M&A documents: Carotek v Kobayashi Ventures; Gerber Scientific International v Satisloh (Property intangible) Troll Tracker suit settles after malice bar raised: Albritton v Cisco(Patent Baristas) (IPEG)(EDTexweblog.com) (The Prior Art) (IAM) US Patents – Decisions CAFC construes term found in specification but not in the claims:… [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 3:39 pm
Origin and Meaning of the Anti-Power-Concentration Principle In Seila Law v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
Spending in election cycles by corporations and the ultrawealthy through so-called dark money groups has skyrocketed since the 2010 Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 8:34 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: EU Commission adopts proposal to extend copyright protection to performing artists from 50 to 95 years: (IPKat), (Out-Law), (IP Law360), (Patry Copyright Blog), (IPEG), (Techdirt), (Techdirt), ‘Triway’ USPTO, EPO, JPO patent work-sharing pilot starts 28 July: (IP Updates), (Patent Docs), (Patent Prospector), (EPO),… [read post]
23 Dec 2007, 8:00 pm
found guilty of mass copyright infringement: (TorrentFreak),EuropeEPOrg Administrative Council on a strategic approach towards EPO 2.0: (BLOG@IP::JUR),Last chance for patent litigation reform in Europe? [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
The SEC has mandated environmental disclosure at least as far back as the Nixon Administration. [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 11:53 am
” Gray v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 6:36 am
Enforcement Director’s New Initiatives In a speech delivered in August marking his first 100 days as Division Director, Mr. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 3:24 pm
”[2] Earlier, in Powell v. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
(IPKat) German Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) guidance regarding registrability of 'spa' in relation to beauty care products and spa services (Class 46) Europe ARMAFOAM: the ECJ rules on linguistic and changes OHIM's rules on conversion: Armacell v OHIM (CATCH US IF YOU CAN !!!) [read post]
