Search for: "Gray v. Group Home"
Results 61 - 80
of 160
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2012, 8:00 am
Gray, 202 Ga.App. 241, 414 S.E.2d 265 (1991), cert. denied (1992); Bayshore Company v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 1:47 pm
Texas Data v. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 6:47 pm
Emphasizing that it was not deciding the operators’ status, the appellate court concluded that because the plaintiffs could hire others to do their jobs and could, and did, sell their jobs to others, there was a triable fact as to whether they were employees or independent contractors (Gray v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
(IP Dragon) Denmark Denmark's new transfer pricing IP valuation guideline (IP finance) Europe ECJ: COLOR EDITION - the A-G delivers his opinion on the application by Lâncome: Lancôme v OHIM and CMS Hasche Sigle (Class 46) ECJ: Diesel ruling affirms that exhausting still trumps trademarks, but consent must be unequivocal: Makro Zelfbedieningsgroothandel CV, Metro Cash & Carry BV and Remo Zaandam BV v Diesel SpA (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI: KINDER vs TIMI… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
(IP Dragon) Denmark Denmark's new transfer pricing IP valuation guideline (IP finance) Europe ECJ: COLOR EDITION - the A-G delivers his opinion on the application by Lâncome: Lancôme v OHIM and CMS Hasche Sigle (Class 46) ECJ: Diesel ruling affirms that exhausting still trumps trademarks, but consent must be unequivocal: Makro Zelfbedieningsgroothandel CV, Metro Cash & Carry BV and Remo Zaandam BV v Diesel SpA (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI: KINDER vs TIMI… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 5:46 am
(IP Dragon) Denmark Denmark’s new transfer pricing IP valuation guideline (IP finance) Europe ECJ: COLOR EDITION – the A-G delivers his opinion on the application by Lâncome: Lancôme v OHIM and CMS Hasche Sigle (Class 46) ECJ: Diesel ruling affirms that exhausting still trumps trademarks, but consent must be unequivocal: Makro Zelfbedieningsgroothandel CV, Metro Cash & Carry BV and Remo Zaandam BV v Diesel SpA… [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
(IP Osgoode) Federal Court: IP infringement and director liability: Target Event Production Ltd. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
(IP Osgoode) Federal Court: IP infringement and director liability: Target Event Production Ltd. v. [read post]
10th Circuit Rules That Mortgage Borrowers Cannot Sue to Rescind After Three Years - No Matter What!
3 Jul 2012, 9:07 am
The 10th Circuit’s ruling is in agreement with previous decisions of the Ninth and Third Circuits, McOmie-Gray v. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 9:55 am
State v. [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 9:18 am
See Whittell v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 5:10 pm
Town of Hallie v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 6:02 am
Court of Claims case Williams & Wilkins Co. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am
COVID-19 PANDEMIC ■David Gaska (deceased), Joan Gaska, Erica Gray, and Gavin Neil Belcher, Applicants v. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 3:00 am
Ltd v Underworks Ptd. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 7:50 am
Calibra Pictures, LLC v. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 8:35 am
State v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 5:27 pm
[Week commencing 13 August] Full Fact v Evening Standard, Clause 1, 17/08/2012; Joseph Horner v The Observer, Clause 1, 16/08/2012; Mr Christopher Mackin v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Jane Hughes v The Independent on Sunday, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Dr Yannis Alexandrides v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Mr Oliver Gray v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Alex Jarvis v Daily Mail, Clauses 3, 5, 15/08/2012; Inspired Thinking… [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
In the latter category we place Newman v. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 1:34 am
The Gray v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions & Anor case - see below. [read post]
