Search for: "Green v. CORRECTIONS DEPARTMENT" Results 61 - 80 of 366
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2010, 12:00 pm by Howard Friedman
First Amendment Center reports on the case.A release from the Rutherford Institute reports that it has filed suit in Virginia federal district court challenging a Virginia Department of Corrections directive that prohibits inmates from receiving CDs containing spoken words. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 7:37 am by Eric Goldman
The word substitution was done as an automatic global replace, so the amended opinion even incorrectly changed a quotation from Green v. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (DN (Rwanda)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department was heard on 7 and 8 October. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 6:26 pm by Law Lady
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent. 1st District.Knowing when to concede error is vital:Appeals -- Sanctions -- Maintaining frivolous defense to appealM.B., Appellant, vs. [read post]
10 Feb 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The most high profile media law story of the week concerned the discontinuance of Sir Philip Green’s libel action against the Daily Telegraph. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 4:35 am
Originally, the writ was intended as a means of correcting `technical errors. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 8:58 am by Patricia Salkin
Penewit v Spring Valley Zoning Board of Appeals, 2019 WL 3761907 (OH App. 8/9/2019)   [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 9:07 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 27356, Feb. 4, 2010) and held that defendants were entitled to qualified immunity in a damage action in which a former prisoner complained that his attempt to change religious designation while in prison was denied under a Department of Corrections policy that allowed inmates to change their religion only once every 12 months.In Malik v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 8:55 am
"Findlaw summaries [may] include opoinions that have not yet been released for publication and may be subject to modification, correction or withdrawl U.S. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 2:31 am by Adam Wagner
R (on the application of ZO (Somalia) and others) (Respondents) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant) [2010] UKSC 36 – Read judgment The Supreme Court has ruled that the UK must provide minimum standards to asylum seekers, including the right to work, whether or not their first asylum application has failed. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 4:10 pm by Jason Miller
On April 28, 2023, the Honorable Mary Catherine Green, County Judge in Lakeland, FL, granted a motion to exclude our client’s breath test after we alleged the machine did not substantially comply with the administrative rules. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 6:08 am by Emma Svoboda
On Jan. 17, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Turkiye Halk Bankasi A.S, v. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Patel v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 12:32 pm
But the 3rd Circuit's decision last week in Pell v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 8:20 am by Barbara S. Mishkin
While their leaning on the “intersession v. intrasession” question was not obvious, the Third Circuit panel did seemvery skeptical about the correctness of the D.C. [read post]