Search for: "Green v. Ferguson" Results 61 - 69 of 69
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
(IPKat) EU favours disclosure of computer patents before standards are set (Intellectual Property Watch) Trade Marks Court of First Instance finds RAUTARUUKKI fails to satisfy acquired distinctiveness criterion: Rautaruukki Oyj v OHIM (Class 46) Court of First Instance finds original signature of famous Italian lutist Antonio Stradivari, in arte Stradivarius, of the 17th century, cannot be read by relevant consumers: T‑340/06 (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 5:20 pm
§ § 1961-68, plaintiffs-appellants Chaz Concrete Co., LLC, Grant Trucking, Inc., Green River Seed and Sod, Inc., and Sweeney Enterprises, Inc. 1 No. 07-5870 Chaz Concrete Co., et al. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 2:00 pm
Oliveira Ardor New York Senior Broker Associate 2 Gina Berger Lower East End Realty Brokerage - Commercial / Investment Sales 2 Ariel Toledano ant propeties inc Brokerage - Residential 3 Michael Xylas Xylas & Ziccardi, LLP Real Estate Attorney 3 Tracy Mehlman Marcus and Millichap Brokerage - Residential 3 David Hale 50 State Building Advisors Executive Vice President 3 Venecia DeSilva upscalecorp@yahoo.com investor 2 John Choi sandboxrealty.com … [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 8:48 am
LEXIS 71 (April 4, 2008): Here, it appears that the robbery occurred mere minutes before Officer Ferguson stopped Green's vehicle. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 9:05 am
Opinion below (Ninth Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply Amicus brief of the United States (in support of the petitioner) __________________ Docket: 07-101 Case name: Finlayson-Green v. [read post]
4 Jul 2007, 11:29 pm
Benn was co-counsel for Johnson v. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 4:33 pm
Contrary to the General Counsel's contention, the majority noted that they did not conclude that the precertification comments of Vice Presidents Rutherford and Ferguson were irrelevant to the surface bargaining issue and instead found that the comments were insufficient to show that the General Counsel had proven the allegation by a preponderance of the evidence. [read post]