Search for: "Green v. Grant" Results 61 - 80 of 2,919
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
District Court for the Southern District of New York granted Macquarie’s motion to dismiss, holding that the plaintiffs had failed to plead an actionable misstatement or omission, a violation of Item 303, and scienter. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 2:03 pm by Carl Shusterman
It also benefits persons who have been ordered deported, granted voluntary departure or who have been granted relief, like withholding of removal, which does not lead to permanent resident status. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 4:10 pm by Jason Miller
On April 28, 2023, the Honorable Mary Catherine Green, County Judge in Lakeland, FL, granted a motion to exclude our client’s breath test after we alleged the machine did not substantially comply with the administrative rules. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 4:38 am by Beatrice Yahia
Amir Tal and Richard Allen Greene report for CNN. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 4:00 am by Evan Brown
On this point, the court looked to the classic Section 230 holdings in Green v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 3:36 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In this regard, there can be more than one proximate cause of an alleged injury (see Grant v Nembhard[*4], 94 AD3d 1397, 1399 [3d Dept 2012]). [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 9:26 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
A district court in Texas ruled in favor of SpaceX, which had countersued on the basis of the Appointments Clause, and granted it a preliminary injunction. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 5:29 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
”Pursuantto the doctrine of [the] law of the case:, judicial determinations made during the course of … litigation before final judgment is entered may have preclusive effect provided thatthe parties had a full and fair opportunity to litigate the initial detetmination” (Sterngass v Town Bd. of Town of Clarkstown, 43 ADJd 1037, I 037 [2d Dept 2007]; see Ruffino v Green; 72 AD3d 785, 786 [2d Dept 2010]). [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 4:28 pm by Kalvis Golde
Book, the two attorneys ask the the justices to grant review and reverse the 8th Circuit’s ruling. [read post]