Search for: "Greene Beverage Company Inc" Results 61 - 70 of 70
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2011, 2:59 am
 The company plead guilty to 16 federal criminal charges and agreed to pay a $1.5 million fine. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 2:40 am
Zebrowski, member of the assembly, for the balance of his unpaid annual compensation 607 A8761 Young -- Relates to bonds of the NYS medical care facilities finance agency 606 A8692C Weinstein (MS) -- Provides that a claim and notice of intention to file a claim in the court of claims need not include the total sum claimed in personal injury and death actions 605 A8664A Canestrari -- Provides for the Beacon Institute Inc. as a public… [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 10:20 pm by Bill Marler
Over the course of the outbreak investigation and the litigation that followed, documents from Foodmaker, the San Diego-based parent company of Jack in the Box, revealed that the company had been warned by local hea [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
: (Canadian Trademark Blog), Liberals settle Green Shift trade mark dispute: (Canadian Trademark Blog), (IPblog.ca), CBC Radio documentary ‘Who owns ideas? [read post]
11 Oct 2014, 9:45 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Dan Hunter (with Irene Calboli), Trademark ProliferationConcerns about too many marks. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 1:19 am
Title228 S6318 GRIFFO -- Provides for the election of delegates to a national party convention or a national party conference 227 S6313 NOZZOLIO -- Relates to limitations against the appointment of non-uniformed persons whose duties include overall security of the department of corrections in the city of New York 226 S6310 LEIBELL -- Relates to agreements relating to marriage 225 S6072 PADAVAN -- Extends for 1 year,… [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure Group (IP Down… [read post]