Search for: "Gregory v. Justice Court" Results 61 - 80 of 982
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2010, 7:34 am by Erin Miller
The essay below for our thirty-day series about John Paul Stevens was written by Gregory Magarian, a professor at Washington University School of Law who clerked for Justice Stevens during the 1994 Supreme Court Term. [read post]
22 May 2008, 12:34 am
(He requested reimbursement after 11 days.)Gregory sued and a State Supreme Court justice vacated the Attorney General's determination. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 3:48 am by Edith Roberts
Gregory Sisk previewed the case for this blog. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 10:19 am by Jeremy Gordon
That is the central question that justices of the Supreme Court considered during oral argument Dec. 7, 2020, in the case of Hungary v. [read post]
9 May 2023, 5:51 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here is the abstract: The Supreme Court’s decision last Term in Castro-Huerta v. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 9:02 am
I'm listening to the Supreme Court oral arguments in the Baze lethal injection case (Baze v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 2:21 am by Ryan Dolby-Stevens, Olswang LLP
Seeing how the Supreme Court Justices, themselves members of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, deal with this issue will be very interesting indeed. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 7:56 am by Marty Lederman
"  The canon in question was applied by the Chief Justice, on behalf of six Justices, in last year's Bond decision--namely, the “the well-established principle” of Gregory v. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 3:54 am by Amy Howe
E.L., in which the Justices ruled that states must recognize an adoption by a same-sex parent that occurred in another state, comes from Jane Schacter, who at Stanford’s Legal Aggregate argues that the decision “creates important protection for families with LGBT parents”; and from Gregory Lipper, who at Protect Thy Neighbor contends that, although “the Alabama Supreme Court got its comeuppance, it’s easy to overlook the human costs of the… [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 10:14 am by Steve Hall
On the second day of its 2011 term, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Maples v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 4:34 am by David DePaolo
So is the "veterinarian's rule," which bars those who work with animals from suing if they are bitten by dogs during treatment.The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Lorraine and Bernard, finding the doctrine applicable to Gregory's work with Alzheimer's patients.A divided 2nd District Court of Appeal panel upheld the ruling last January.A Supreme Court majority consisting of Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye and… [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 1:17 pm
This question is not always so simple, as indicated by a recent case in Nova Scotia, Jollimore Estate v. [read post]