Search for: "H. Q. Incorporated"
Results 61 - 79
of 79
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2011, 6:02 am
By Steven G. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 10:22 am
As noted above, mandate of clause q of Section 108 of the Transfer of Property Act 1882 is that on the expiry of the lease the lessee is bound to hand over possession of the leased premises to the lessor and therefore the lessor would be entitled to maintain an action to compel the lessees to abide by the mandate of clause q of Section 108 of the Transfer of Property Act 1882. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 9:19 pm
whereas the minimum safeguards provided for in Regulation No 44/2001 must be maintained, H. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 10:56 am
(q) Effective December 8, 2002, "physical therapy services" shall mean physical therapy as defined by section sixty-seven hundred thirty-one of the Education Law. 34-1.3 Referral prohibited. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 10:37 pm
District Court’s “[H]odgepodge of [C]onstitutionally [Q]uestionable [I]nquiries” Uniformly Rejected The District Court adopted a Third Circuit test – from LeBoon v. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 6:45 am
” Market effect: testable H is “fair use is more likely when P and D are in different industries. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 8:44 pm
Multidisciplinary clinical practices present complex and overlapping legal issues including fee-splitting and kickback questions. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 11:46 am
(See Exhibit H.) [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 10:34 am
Section 604 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act expanded the definition of statutory disqualification under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by creating Exchange Act Section 15(b)(4)(H) and then incorporating it into Exchange Act Section 3(a)(39). [read post]
28 Nov 2009, 4:23 pm
(h) Notwithstanding subdivision (g), a person or business that maintains its own notification procedures as part of an information security policy for the treatment of personal information and is otherwise consistent with the timing requirements of this part, shall be deemed to be in compliance with the notification requirements of this section if the person or business notifies subject persons in accordance with its policies in the event of a breach of security of the system. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 3:49 pm
Chesnut, audit committee members Allison H. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 10:00 am
Alexander H. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 3:44 am
Hershenhorn and Anthony H. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 5:22 pm
--An eligible person described in this subsection is-- (1) an individual who is-- (A) a citizen or legal resident of the United States; or (B) a member of a group that includes citizens or legal residents of the United States; or (2) an entity that is incorporated and maintains its primary place of business in the United States. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 9:03 am
§ §341, 343(b), 343(c), 343(d), 343(e), 343(f), 343(g), 343(h), 343(i), 343(k), 343(q), or 343(r)) relating to food.Drug and device companies don't have that problem, which - as we explained in our prior post - is why the California Supreme Court had to jump through all the hoops it did to avoid preemption.So with this point in mind, we look at the defendants' certiorari petition in Albertsons/Farm Raised Salmon. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 1:33 am
Source: New York Legislative Retrieval System (LRS), Search run on June 1, 2008:
Sorted by Chapter Law Number. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 1:57 pm
§ 994(q)) 29) Certainty (28 U.S.C. [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 2:41 pm
This section generally incorporates a presumption of openness, and the need for demonstrating compelling grounds to overcome the presumption. [read post]
