Search for: "HARMS v. HARMS" Results 61 - 80 of 36,408
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2022, 1:30 pm by Deniro Pillay (ZA)
In a November judgment in Lakay v Minister of Justice & Another 2022 ZAWCHC 221, the court confirmed that the occupier of a property has a legal duty to prevent foreseeable harm to persons visiting the property. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal has now handed down judgment in Lachaux v AOL (UK), Independent Print Ltd & Evening Standard Ltd [2017] EWCA Civ 1334, indicating that rather than a wholesale reform of the law, the serious harm threshold represents a mere revision of the principle established in Thornton v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2010] EWHC 1414 (QB) that in order to be defamatory a statement must surpass a threshold of seriousness, being a tendency to cause substantial… [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal has now handed down judgment in Lachaux v AOL (UK), Independent Print Ltd & Evening Standard Ltd [2017] EWCA Civ 1334, indicating that rather than a wholesale reform of the law, the serious harm threshold represents a mere revision of the principle established in Thornton v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2010] EWHC 1414 (QB) that in order to be defamatory a statement must surpass a threshold of seriousness, being a tendency to cause substantial… [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal has now handed down judgment in Lachaux v AOL (UK), Independent Print Ltd & Evening Standard Ltd [2017] EWCA Civ 1334, indicating that rather than a wholesale reform of the law, the serious harm threshold represents a mere revision of the principle established in Thornton v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2010] EWHC 1414 (QB) that in order to be defamatory a statement must surpass a threshold of seriousness, being a tendency to cause substantial… [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 4:40 am by INFORRM
On 12 September 2017 the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in the important “serious harm” case of Lachaux v. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 3:44 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Ward v Klein  2022 NY Slip Op 02153 [203 AD3d 1216] March 30, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department represents the “no harm-no foul” analysis frequently applied to legal malpractice claims. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 5:12 am
This presumption cannot be squared with traditional principles of equity, as interpreted in numerous Supreme Court decisions, particularly eBay, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 5:46 am by INFORRM
On 21 March 2018 the Supreme Court (Lords Kerr and Reed and Lady Black) granted the defendants permission to appeal in the case of Lachaux v Independent Print. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm by Mary Sullivan
Supreme Court decided AMG Capital Management v. [read post]