Search for: "HARRIS v. ARMY " Results 61 - 80 of 148
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2020, 4:00 pm
I have misgivings about where he and Kamala Harris want to go. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 5:22 am by William Ford
Dan Maurer posited that the president’s intervention in the case of former Army Maj. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 6:15 am by Marty Lederman
They alleged that the commission had “on other occasions licensed professional boxers who had been convicted of crimes involving moral turpitude,” including Rocky Graziano, who was licensed despite the fact that he had been twice convicted of petty larceny and had been court-martialed while serving in the United States Army and convicted of being absent without leave and of disobeying orders, and Sonny Liston himself, whom the commission recognized as heavyweight champion (until… [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 11:16 am by John Elwood
Secretary of the Army, 17-225 Issue: Whether Bowles v. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 12:00 pm by Ritika Singh
Shane Harris parses what we’ve all been wondering: How did the Syrian Electronic Army get so good? [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
A data breach compromised personal data of over 100 U.K. army recruits and shut down the army’s online recruitment portal for more than a month. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 11:36 am by Benjamin Bissell
The New York Times divulges that France has signed a USD 3 billion deal to arm the Lebanese Army, to be paid for by Saudi Arabia. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 12:17 pm by Elina Saxena, Cody M. Poplin
Shane Harris of the Daily Beast notes that the dump “had no obvious public policy value” while Foreign Policy tells us the release was a “snoozefest. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 2:42 pm by JB
Two interesting amicus briefs in Obergefell v. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 11:16 am by Cody M. Poplin
  Yet Shane Harris and Nancy A. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 11:39 am by John Elwood
Booker, Johnson v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 9:16 am by Scott Bomboy
Circling back to Dean Chemerinsky’s argument is the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]