Search for: "HARRIS v. UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT" Results 61 - 80 of 1,822
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2023, 11:48 am by Shea Denning
The Singleton Court explained that while the United States Supreme Court rejected decades ago the notion that a defective indictment necessarily deprives a trial court of jurisdiction, see United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2023, 3:43 pm by Mavrick Law Firm
  Although neither the Florida nor the Federal Civil Rights Acts specifically mention sexual harassment, the United States Supreme Court in Harris v. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
  A South Carolina lawyer will ask the Supreme Court to rename Brown v. [read post]
14 May 2023, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
He also represented Clarence Earl Gideon in what became a landmark Supreme Court case, decision Gideon v. [read post]
5 May 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
With the Supreme Court’s retrenchment of the constitutional right of abortion, Suk points out that it is not only Roe v Wade, but the complicated Roe/Harris compromise, that has been overturned. [read post]
Few people have questioned why the Supreme Court does not reflect the religious diversity of the population of the United States. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:28 am by Eugene Volokh
And of course, the Supreme Court has repeatedly reaffirmed this, for instance in Harris v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:25 am by INFORRM
Canada On 20 March 2023, the Supreme Court of British Columbia ordered the plaintiffs to pay the reasonable costs of the defendant on a full indemnity basis, in the case of Mawhinney v Stewart, 2023 BCSC 419, [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 5:58 am by madeo-design
Bush appointed her to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
18 Mar 2023, 8:08 am by Guest Author
Google LLC, soon to be decided by the Supreme Court), government can incentivize or mandate specific moderation practices and processes. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 3:45 am by Emma Snell
The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear oral arguments today and tomorrow in two cases that could significantly reshape online speech and content moderation. [read post]