Search for: "HATFIELD v. HATFIELD" Results 61 - 80 of 175
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2009, 3:22 pm
While we wait for Bedfordshire CC v Taylor and others (former subtenants) and McGlynn v Welwyn & Hatfield DC (non secure tenancy) in the Court of Appeal, which will be a couple of months for the latter and who knows when for the former, anecdotal evidence of settling is interesting. [read post]
30 Jan 2010, 5:24 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Wilkinson, R v [2009] EWCA Crim 2733 (11 December 2009) Josephs, R v [2009] EWCA Crim 2800 (17 December 2009) Sheppard & Anor, R v [2010] EWCA Crim 65 (29 January 2010) C & Anor, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 72 (29 January 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Akzo Nobel UK Ltd v Arista Tubes Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 28 (29 January 2010) Parkwood Leisure Ltd v Mark Alemo-Herron & 23 Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 24… [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 1:13 pm by Dave
 And, in a way, Tachie, Terera and Il v Welwyn Hatfield BC [2013] EWHC 3972 (QB) is a Christmas gift for local authorities which have contracted out their homelessness decision-making (on which we have paused for comment a couple of times here and here). [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 1:13 pm by Dave
 And, in a way, Tachie, Terera and Il v Welwyn Hatfield BC [2013] EWHC 3972 (QB) is a Christmas gift for local authorities which have contracted out their homelessness decision-making (on which we have paused for comment a couple of times here and here). [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 2:59 am by Walter Olson
Fairfield County as well as public university due process case of Doe v. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 10:48 pm
Another generic drug manufacturer picked off a preemption victory today.In Mensing v. [read post]
16 Jan 2010, 6:25 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
Federal Rule of Evidence 803(8)(B) provides that Records, reports, statements, or data compilations, in any form, of public offices or agencies, setting forth...matters observed pursuant to duty imposed by law as to which matters there was a duty to report,... [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 8:36 am
Hatfield, 591 F.3d 945, 949–50 (7th Cir.2010) (explaining that the term “reasonable doubt” is best left undefined); United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 2:20 pm by David Super
  The same can be true on the Court:  how important was Chief Justice Burger’s joining an already-lopsided majority in Roe v. [read post]