Search for: "HOWES v. DUKES et al"
Results 61 - 80
of 150
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2011, 12:40 pm
Dukes, 10-277. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 10:12 am
Press, et al. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 7:51 am
Expanding and intensified level of DOL enforcement, as well as likely impact of the upcoming Supreme Court decision in Christopher, et al v. [read post]
5 Key Trends In Workplace Class Action Litigation For 2019: The Impact Of U.S. Supreme Court Rulings
16 Jan 2020, 11:18 am
Frank, et al. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 8:45 am
Italian Colors Restaurant, et al., No. 12-133 (argued February 27, 2013) and 3) offers of judgment under FRCP Rule 68 in Fair Labor Standards Act collective actions and the effect on FRCP Rule 23 class actions (Genesis Healthcare Corp. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 5:43 am
The NAB v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 10:47 am
Copyright protections apply to works differently by country, and each country has its own standards for how and when a work can enter the public domain. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 7:32 am
Betty Dukes, Et Al v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 6:54 pm
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit upheld a district court order denying class certification in a nationwide Title VII gender discrimination action in Tabor, et al. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 4:24 pm
Supreme Court case of Dukes et al v. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 1:03 pm
In Phipps, et al. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 1:03 pm
In Phipps, et al. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 9:49 am
CalPERS, et al. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 11:02 am
Dukes, et al., No. 10-277, 564 U.S. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 11:27 am
Bouaphakeo et al., No. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 8:20 am
Rev. 1833-1893 (2010).TRANSNATIONAL WATERWAYS.McKinney, Matthew, et al. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 9:29 pm
(See, e.g., Acharya et al.). [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 6:40 am
Gomez, et al., 136 S. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 10:16 pm
City of Seattle, et al. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 2:58 pm
Hollaar; and from Intel, et al.: “At the time of the Constitution’s adoption, there was no established rule that only courts could invalidate patents. [read post]
