Search for: "Hand v. Rhodes" Results 61 - 80 of 332
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2021, 3:00 am by Glen C. Hansen and Daniel S. Cucchi
Rhode Island, 533 U.S. 606, 633 (O’Connor, J., concurring) [“Our polestar instead remains the principles set forth in Penn Central itself and our other cases that govern partial regulatory takings” (emphasis added)]; Koontz v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 3:00 am by Glen C. Hansen and Daniel S. Cucchi
Rhode Island, 533 U.S. 606, 633 (O’Connor, J., concurring) [“Our polestar instead remains the principles set forth in Penn Central itself and our other cases that govern partial regulatory takings” (emphasis added)]; Koontz v. [read post]
25 May 2021, 2:55 am by Colby Pastre
Table of Contents Key Findings Introduction A Brief Overview of GILTI Calculating GILTI Tax Liability State Taxation of GILTI Is Complex and Uncompetitive State Taxation of GILTI Raises Constitutional Issues Current Status of States’ Taxation of GILTI The Impact on States of the Biden Administration’s Proposed Federal Changes to GILTI A Brief Overview of FDII Current State Treatment of the FDII Deduction and the Impact of the Biden Administration’s Proposed Changes Recent… [read post]
For example, in 2016, the federal Defend Trade Secrets Act was enacted to provide both a federal cause of action as well as enhanced remedies.iii On the other hand, state laws, including those in Massachusetts, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, New Hampshire, Washington and Rhode Island, have limited the other method used by employers---noncompete agreements---to protect their competitive advantage, and the Biden administration has promised to ban or limit them.iv While trade secret… [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
With free legal aid from National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, Geary filed a federal complaint arguing the union infringed on her constitutionally protected rights under the foundation-won CWA v. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 6:42 am by Cyberleagle
The government has now published the Final Response to its Consultation on the April 2019 Online Harms White Paper. [read post]
Once the ballot leaves the voter’s hand, the voter has no control over what the third party might do with the ballot—revote it, tamper with it, destroy it or fail to deliver it on time. [read post]