Search for: "Harding v. Handy"
Results 61 - 80
of 125
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2013, 8:58 pm
In customs litigation, this can be a handy tool. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 7:58 am
Over on IP Finance, fellow Kat Neil muses about the IP dimensions of 3D printing while, on the 1709 Blog, Iona Harding updates us on the recent decision of Mr Justice Arnold (Chancery Division, England and Wales) in EMI and others v BSkyB and others on website blocking injunctions -- a subject which is starting to develop quite an interesting jurisprudence. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 9:02 am
Both points could come in handy for defamation defendants. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 9:22 am
I plan to post these case development summaries in the coming weeks and then reprint them here so they're all collected in one handy place. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 8:29 am
Smith v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
The New Zealand Listener has put together a handy timeline of the Megaupload case. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 11:56 am
Here again American jurisprudence proves handy. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 10:05 pm
I have used my iPad during oral arguments in court many times, and it has come in very handy. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 8:07 pm
Collabortive v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 6:02 am
And as Lawrence v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 10:58 pm
Second, those papers which carry the most soft news also carry the least hard news, thus badly denting the ‘subsidy’ argument. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 9:29 am
Further, LEMIT's model policy could provide courts a handy guideline as to whether a local policy deviates from best practices. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 3:33 am
Think long and hard, pick your best points and make them stick. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 12:30 am
AM v. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 7:38 am
We’ll begin with the following sample citation in the OSCOLA style: Jones & others v Wright [1991] 3 All ER 88. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 3:38 am
” It’s hard to tell how a court’s going to resolve that. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 3:43 am
Harding and State v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 5:42 am
How handy is that? [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 12:51 pm
” United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 3:55 pm
However reputed and distinctive the KINDER mark might be, no amount of fame and reputation could make it similar to a mark that wasn't similar to it (taking the distinctiveness and repute of a mark into account is handy for assessing whether there is a likelihood of confusion between marks that are similar, and it's sometimes handy for showing that two marks can't be confused, as in Case C-361/04 P Ruiz-Picasso v OHIM, but can't make two marks similar… [read post]
