Search for: "Harding v. Regent" Results 61 - 80 of 141
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2016, 9:39 am by Guest Blogger
The result has been to contort strict scrutiny to sustain the narrow set of relevant challenged laws, as seen in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 2:27 pm by bndmorris
Murphy’s article Punitive Damages, Explanatory Verdicts, and the Hard Look was cited in the following publication: Lawrence G. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 9:52 am
Board of Regents for Oklahoma Agricultural & Mechanical Colleges (10th Cir. 1993), The Tenth Circuit did no better. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 9:31 am
In the wake of the turmoil, some faculty members have called for Chancellor Michael V. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
Since declaring affirmative action in admissions to be unconstitutional in 1978 in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
2 Feb 2014, 10:37 am by Jake McGowan
But absent some major uproar, it is hard to understand how this escalated the way it did. [read post]
21 Sep 2014, 3:37 pm
 The reasons for this are not hard to find. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
” That sounds a lot like acceptance of Justice Powell’s approach in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
20 Jun 2020, 7:36 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Yet it is hard to escape the conclusion in how Chenery I was applied to bar the agency head's supplemental memo. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 5:18 am by SHG
  And they are still angry about it.It's reminiscent of the controversy that arose when the Supreme Court decided Board of Regents v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 5:58 pm by David Kopel
Florida Board of Regents, and Alabama v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 8:54 am by Vik Amar
” That sounds a lot like acceptance of Justice Powell’s approach in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 10:35 am by Nora Freeman Engstrom, Robert L. Rabin
Regents of California (1976), which imposed a “duty to warn” on therapists, and Sindell v. [read post]