Search for: "Harding v. USA" Results 61 - 80 of 813
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2022, 9:02 am by Adam Kielich
In 2011 the Texas Supreme Court issued its decision in Marsh USA, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 5:10 am by Simon Lester
In the ongoing USMCA dispute on United States - Automotive Rules of Origin (USA-MEX-CDA-2022-31-01), in addition to their arguments that the U.S. unilateral interpretation of the USMCA Rules of Origin provisions for passenger vehicles and light trucks violates USMCA rules, Mexico and Canada have made a non-violation nullification or impairment claim. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 5:10 am by Simon Lester
In the ongoing USMCA dispute on United States - Automotive Rules of Origin (USA-MEX-CDA-2022-31-01), in addition to their arguments that the U.S. unilateral interpretation of the USMCA Rules of Origin provisions for passenger vehicles and light trucks violates USMCA rules, Mexico and Canada have made a non-violation nullification or impairment claim. [read post]
24 May 2022, 5:01 am by George Croner
Finally, the separate authority provided in §1861 (and modified by the USA Freedom Act in 2015) permitting the government to acquire call detail records (CDRs) also expired in March 2020. [read post]
24 May 2022, 5:01 am by George Croner
Finally, the separate authority provided in §1861 (and modified by the USA Freedom Act in 2015) permitting the government to acquire call detail records (CDRs) also expired in March 2020. [read post]
5 May 2022, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
Below is my column in USA Today on the leaking of the draft opinion in Dobbs v. [read post]
16 Apr 2022, 2:49 pm by Dennis Crouch
Velodyne Lidar USA, Inc., 24 F.4th 1406, 1418 (Fed. [read post]
15 Mar 2022, 4:00 am by Michael Woods and Gordon LaFortune
On January 4, 2022, the Canada United States Mexico Agreement (CUSMA) Panel on Canada’s Dairy Tariff Rate Quotas (TRQs) released its ruling.[1] The Panel Decides—Both Sides Claim Victory The Panel ruled that Canada’s practice of reserving 85-100% of dairy TRQs for processors violated Article 3.A.2.11(b) of CUSMA. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 11:57 am by John Holtz
In fact, they are not even considered “procurements” by the COFC, as SpaceX learned the hard way in 2019 in Space Exploration Technologies, Corp. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
  It’s a system which has generally worked well over the years and is a world away from, say, the absurdity of politically appointed judges in the USA. [read post]