Search for: "Harkins v. Harkins"
Results 61 - 80
of 117
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2012, 4:14 pm
Now, two Iowa Senators Tom Harkin (D-IA) and Chuck Grassley (R-IA) have joined forces with Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT), to introduce legislation that restores imperative civil rights protections for workers over the age of 40 that were limited following the Supreme Court’s disproportionately unfair decision in Gross v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:57 am
The bill seeks to return age discrimination plaintiffs to the standard the Senators believe they were subject to prior to the Supreme Court’s ruling in Gross v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 1:00 am
R v McCool (Northern Ireland); R v Harkin (Northern Ireland), heard 23 Nov 2017. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:00 am
R v McCool (Northern Ireland); R v Harkin (Northern Ireland), heard 23 Nov 2017. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 2:00 am
R v McCool (Northern Ireland); R v Harkin (Northern Ireland), heard 23 Nov 2017. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 1:00 am
R v McCool (Northern Ireland); R v Harkin (Northern Ireland), heard 23 Nov 2017. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 1:17 am
R v McCool (Northern Ireland); R v Harkin (Northern Ireland), heard 23 Nov 2017. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 2:00 am
R v McCool (Northern Ireland); R v Harkin (Northern Ireland), heard 23 Nov 2017. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 1:00 am
R v McCool (Northern Ireland); R v Harkin (Northern Ireland), heard 23 Nov 2017. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 1:00 am
R v McCool (Northern Ireland); R v Harkin (Northern Ireland), heard 23 Nov 2017. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 1:00 am
R v McCool (Northern Ireland); R v Harkin (Northern Ireland), heard 23 Nov 2017. [read post]
28 Jan 2018, 1:00 am
R v McCool (Northern Ireland); R v Harkin (Northern Ireland), heard 23 Nov 2017. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 1:00 am
R v McCool (Northern Ireland); R v Harkin (Northern Ireland), heard 23 Nov 2017. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 1:00 am
On Thursday 23 November, the Supreme Court will hear the appeals of R v McCool (Northern Ireland); R v Harkin (Northern Ireland). [read post]
14 Apr 2012, 11:13 am
ISDA and SIFMA v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 3:10 pm
The bill was introduced by Senator Menendez (D - NJ) and at this point has only three co-sponsors, Senators Gillibrand (D-NY), Murray (D-Wash), and Harkin (D-Iowa). [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 10:31 am
"To be entitled to an estoppel, the plaintiff must show, in addition to fraudulent conduct by the physician, that he was diligent in commencing the action once he learned of the malpractice" (Harkin v Culleton, 156 AD2d 19, 21 [1990], lv dismissed 76 NY2d 936 [1990]). [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 10:31 am
"To be entitled to an estoppel, the plaintiff must show, in addition to fraudulent conduct by the physician, that he was diligent in commencing the action once he learned of the malpractice" (Harkin v Culleton, 156 AD2d 19, 21 [1990], lv dismissed 76 NY2d 936 [1990]). [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 12:00 am
Taylor v. [read post]
