Search for: "Harmon v. Holder" Results 61 - 80 of 142
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jan 2012, 11:47 am by Howard Knopf
For the latter, see charts by:GasawayHirtle Benedict O'Mahoney Moreover, there is a case called Golan v. [read post]
24 Jan 2025, 11:13 am by Brandon Kelloway
This development is expected to reduce conflicts and enhance legal certainty for patent holders operating in multiple European countries. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
In an effort to harmonize these conflicting demands, the Court has assumed that compliance with the VRA is a compelling State interest for Fourteenth Amendment purposes, see e.g., Bethune-Hill v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
In an effort to harmonize these conflicting demands, the Court has assumed that compliance with the VRA is a compelling State interest for Fourteenth Amendment purposes, see e.g., Bethune-Hill v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 7:22 am
  The second case was ViiV Healthcare v Minister of Health, where a judicial review was filed earlier this year. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 4:15 am by Ben
Only the last of these has been the subject of harmonization at a European level, and thus falls within the competence of the Court of Justice. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 12:46 pm by Bruce E. Boyden
The Supreme Court heard oral argument this morning in Golan v. [read post]
“Labels of generics and branded generics must be harmonized (form and content) with their respective Standard Label with respect to information on the efficacy and safety for the drug’s use. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 11:44 am by Dennis Crouch
  This reality has created practical problems in dealing with holders of low-quality patents who seek large damage awards. [read post]