Search for: "Harris v. Robinson" Results 61 - 80 of 106
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2010, 9:10 pm by cdw
” Counsel for petitioner are  Rob Owen (Owen & Roundtree), as well as Skadden Aarps’ attorneys Douglas G Robinson & Maria Cruz Melendez. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 3:47 am by Edith Roberts
”  [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is counsel on an amicus brief in support of respondent Stephens in Harris Funeral Homes v. [read post]
9 May 2022, 8:51 am by William C. MacLeod
Harry Covington (D-Md)—the floor manager of the bill that became the FTC Act—assured his colleagues that Congress was not granting the FTC the power for legislative rulemaking. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Journalism and regulation There are no new PCC adjudications to report, but several resolved complaints including: Alexander Anderson v Press & Journal (Aberdeen), 8/02/2013; Dr Mark Bailey v Irish News, Clause 1, 07/02/2013; A man & a woman v Sunday World, Clauses 1, 3, 5, 07/02/2013; Hertfordshire Constabulary v Hertfordshire Mercury, Clause 1, 07/02/2013; A woman v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 3, 07/02/2013, A woman v The Mail on… [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 3:52 am by INFORRM
IPSO 21877-23 Wieser v Mail Online, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 22285-23 Robinson v Mail Online, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation Statements in Open Court and Apologies The Daily Mirror has followed the Guardian and apologised to Dan Wootton for reporting on a police investigation against the former GB News presenter. [read post]
13 Mar 2021, 5:00 am by Andrew Delaney
Justice Robinson dissents, reasoning that the two proceedings were different and that Mr. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
Harris, or in the best interest of society. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 9:32 am by Eugene Volokh
Many cases allow people who allege they had been sexually assaulted to be pseudonymous,[1] including when they are defendants being sued for libel and related torts.[2] Indeed, some allow pseudonymity for the alleged attacker as well as the alleged victim, if the two had been spouses or lovers in the past, because identifying one would also identify the other, at least to people who had known the couple.[3] But again, many other cases hold otherwise, some in highly prominent cases (for instance,… [read post]