Search for: "Harris v. Shields" Results 61 - 80 of 193
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2016, 1:23 pm by Alex Loomis
The Supreme Court has other ways of shielding itself from such problems. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 1:20 am
Kramarsky, a member of Dewey Pegno & Kramarsky, writes that the recent decision in Barclays Capital Inc. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Blue Cross & Blue Shield United of Wisconsin (7th Cir.1997) (holding that plaintiff's obsessive-compulsive disorder was a "common enough" disorder and not so "shameful" that it warranted anonymity); Doe v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:41 pm by David Super
  Doing so, however, would inevitably lead to charges that he is shielding the President for political reasons. [read post]
4 May 2020, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 3:52 pm by Lovechilde
”  But claims of executive privilege can be overcome by a compelling government interest in disclosure and, as the Supreme Court held in U.S. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 1:45 am by INFORRM
The seven claimants bringing proceedings are: Baroness Lawrence of Clarendon OBE; Elizabeth Hurley; Sir Elton John CH CBE; David Furnish; Sir Simon Hughes; Prince Harry, the Duke of Sussex; and Sadie Frost Law. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 5:00 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  See this post by Harry Weller, noting that Justice Breyer cites a study as if it were authoritative even though it has been tried in court and found to be invalid. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 5:32 pm
Harry's will divided his estate between a trust (Harry's Marital Trust) and an outright disposition to Ruth. [read post]