Search for: "Harris v. Superior Court"
Results 61 - 80
of 457
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2020, 6:33 pm
My Research Assistant at The University of Chicago Law School, Tanner Harris, has been reading and tracking these articles over the last few months. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 6:47 pm
Co. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 8:28 am
Supp. 3d 1, 4 (D.D.C. 2019); see also Harris v. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 4:00 am
Then in 1973 the Supreme Court of Canada case Calder v. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 5:04 am
The three new state courts – Los Angeles County Superior Court (615,000+ cases), Harris County District Court (175,000+ cases) and Harris County Court (80,000+ cases) – each have their own data collection infrastructure and nuances. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 8:36 am
The Superior Court of Los Angeles County. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 5:00 am
July 19, 2019), the Pennsylvania Superior Court held that the Lehigh County Court of Common Pleas did not commit any error in a products liability case when it instructed the jury on both the consumer expectation test and the risk-utility test that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court established in the case of Tincher v. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 2:11 pm
Plaintiffs in Harris, et al v. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 2:11 pm
Plaintiffs in Harris, et al v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 9:51 pm
Harris, 328 F. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 2:42 pm
Accordingly, the court affirmed the holding of the superior court. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 9:17 am
Under the original version of this statute, the prosecutor would have needed permission from a superior court judge before he or she could resubmit an indictment after it had been rejected by [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 5:02 am
Harris, 890 F.3d 480, 492 (4th Cir. 2018) (citation omitted). [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court in 1986 in Meritor v. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 7:58 pm
See Harris v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 1:26 am
Kavanagh, 2019 ONSC 5552 the Ontario Superior Court of Justice refused dismissed an application by the defendant under the Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation provisions in s. 137.1(3) of the Courts of Justice Act. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:21 am
While represented by counsel, the Shireys voluntarily bargained for and agreed upon a settlement on all issues of alimony, child custody and support, and equitable distribution, which was reduced to writing, signed by all parties and was jointly presented to the court and entered as a Consent Order in the Mecklenburg County Clerk of Superior Court on 24 May 2016. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 3:21 pm
Superior Court. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 5:21 am
Superior Court (2003) 108 Cal. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 10:49 am
A similar result was reached by the California Court of Appeals in 2005 in Anderson, McPharlin & Connors v. [read post]
