Search for: "Hart v. Secretary of State"
Results 61 - 80
of 122
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2011, 9:20 am
AM v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 710 (21 June 2011) ?? [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 12:57 am
In Sanoma Uitgevers B.V. v. the Netherlands, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights found, unanimously, a violation of article 10 ECHR. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 4:38 pm
Also differences based on housing status has been held to be within Art 14 (Larkos v Cyprus 30 EHRR 597, R (RJM) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2009] 1 AC 311).If the arguments were right, it would affect many provisions of the Housing Acts and Rent Acts. [read post]
3 May 2011, 1:35 am
RK (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 456 (20 April 2011) Court of appeal sends Zimbabwean asylum case back to tribunal as need more evidence as to whether they would have to lie about political beliefs. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 8:00 am
They were: Rylands v Fletcher (1866) LR 3 HL 330 Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co [1893] 1 QB 256 Salomon v A Salomon & Co [1897] AC 22 Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 Woolmington v Director of Public Prosecutions [1935] AC 462 Liversidge v Anderson [1942] AC 206 Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd [1947] KB 130 Associated Provincial Picture Houses v Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 KB 223 Anisminic… [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 2:10 pm
A post on the Freemovement blog on the recent case of Lamichhane v Secretary of State for the Home Department states that just that may be happening in a subset of immigration cases. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 1:22 am
Sapkota v Secretary of State for the Home Department: Court of Appeal case about segregation of immigration decisions – by the Free Movement Blog. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 4:25 pm
Culture Secretary Oliver Dowden and Health Secretary Matt Hancock held a virtual roundtable with the tech giants, who also agreed to commit to the principle that no user or company should directly profit from Covid-19 misinformation or disinformation. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 10:55 pm
Open justice David Hart QC has blogged on the UKHRB on the recent decision by the Court of Appeal in R (on the application of Guardian Newspapers) v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 12:39 am
In the courts: RG v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and North Wiltshire District Council (HB) [2011] UKUT 198 (AAC) (05 May 2011): Failure to provide family with enough housing benefit to give disabled daughters separate bedrooms not breach of human rights Parker Rhodes Hickmotts Solicitors v The Legal Services Commission [2011] EWHC 1323 (Admin) (25 May 2011): Immigration solicitor fails in challenge to Legal Aid contract – “sad” but… [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 12:27 am
The Secretary of State for Justice v RB & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 1608 (20 December…. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 3:00 pm
AJ (India) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 1191 (27 July 2011… Court of Appeal dismisses 3 joined asylum appeals: welfare of children was sufficiently taken into account. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 12:47 am
Case-law commentaries from across the blogosphere: Last week the Supreme court refused to grant Heringey Council and the Secretary of State leave to appeal the decision in Sharon Shoesmith’s case. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 11:30 pm
Housing and human rights The Nearly Legal blog sets out three recent decisions from the European Court of Human Rights on the subject of housing, including Bjedov v Croatia, Jarnea and others v Romania, and Costache v Romania. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 4:23 am
The Government of the United States of America v Richard O’Dwyer. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 1:51 pm
G1 v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 867. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 3:19 am
In Broida, the court concluded that jurisdiction could be exercised over an action involving the internal affairs of a foreign corporation doing business in New York, unless New York was an inappropriate or inconvenient forum (id. at 91-92; see Hart v General Motors Corp., 129 AD2d 179, 185-186 [1st Dept 1987], lv denied 70 NY2d 608 [1987]). [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 3:19 am
In Broida, the court concluded that jurisdiction could be exercised over an action involving the internal affairs of a foreign corporation doing business in New York, unless New York was an inappropriate or inconvenient forum (id. at 91-92; see Hart v General Motors Corp., 129 AD2d 179, 185-186 [1st Dept 1987], lv denied 70 NY2d 608 [1987]). [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 3:19 am
In Broida, the court concluded that jurisdiction could be exercised over an action involving the internal affairs of a foreign corporation doing business in New York, unless New York was an inappropriate or inconvenient forum (id. at 91-92; see Hart v General Motors Corp., 129 AD2d 179, 185-186 [1st Dept 1987], lv denied 70 NY2d 608 [1987]). [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 6:13 am
Amicus brief of Institute for Justice Motion of Federal Election Commission to dismiss or affirm Hart v. [read post]
