Search for: "Haslam v. Haslam"
Results 61 - 78
of 78
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2012, 10:37 am
The recent Tennessee Court of Appeals decision of Mae Coleman v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 6:52 am
Wyeth (hormone therapy) Trial2008-03-17 Haslam v. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 8:53 pm
Pfizer (Bextra) Deposition 2008-03-17 Haslam v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 10:09 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Property Law Opinions Body: Below is today's property law Appellate Court opinion: AC32761 - Haslam-James v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 12:37 pm
Haslam, Comment, Leveling the playing field: using rational basis with a bite as means of overcoming the NCAA’s violation of equal protection, 37 OHIO NORTHERN UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW 283 (2011) Darren Heitner & Jeffrey F. [read post]
THAT’S FUNNY, I THOUGHT TENNESSEE HAD ELECTED A REPUBLICAN GOVERNOR: Tennessee Gov. Bill Haslam Wil…
7 Jul 2011, 2:29 pm
It’s clearly within Congress’s proper role and — as the Supreme Court held in Quill v. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 5:31 am
Haslam, 2009 Ohio 696, 2009 Ohio App. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 7:03 am
Ltd v Parle Agro Pvt. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 8:28 am
July 7, 2008), Haslam v. [read post]
14 May 2007, 10:49 pm
Eagle-eyed Simon Haslam was swift to spot this BBC item, a follow-up to an item the IPKat dug up a year ago on the late lamented Ananova news service. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 11:39 am
", an analytical dissection of a piece of recent judicial history, SOCAN v Canadian Association of Internet Providers, by Susanna H. [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 11:12 pm
Verizon has now asked for an injunction that would stop Vonage from connecting its customers to landline telephones.The IPKat wonders whether, in the light of the Supreme Court ruling in eBay v MercExchange, this is exactly the sort of situation in which, given the likely disruption of so many phone users and the typically licence-related scenario for a solution, injunctive relief would be refused. [read post]
11 Mar 2007, 8:20 am
A "quick and dirty" translation of the reasoning of the Advocate General in the LIMONCHELO dispute, Case C- 344/05 P OHIM v Shaker (see earlier post by the IPKat here), comes from Stéphane Ambrosini (Tomkins & Co, Dublin): "24. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 8:05 am
The US Supreme Court has exercised a major influence on all areas of IP in recent times (the Napster, Grokster, Victoria's Secret and eBay v MercExchange rulings, to name but a few). [read post]
18 Dec 2006, 7:28 am
Thanks, Simon Haslam (Abel & Imray), spotting it.This was Halliburton's appeal against the decision of Pumfrey J (here , noted by the IPKat here), that its patent for rotary cone drill bits was invalid for insufficiency. [read post]
23 Nov 2006, 5:30 pm
Cinpres back in court, but to no availFurther thanks are due to Simon Haslam for spotting Cinpres Gas Injection Ltd v Melea Ltd, another round in the frankly tragic litigation between two companies over a patent that Cinpres lost following a bout of legally sanctioned perjury. [read post]
24 Oct 2006, 6:52 am
This Friday, 27 October, at 9.45am - and not a minute earlier - the Court of Appeal for England and Wales gives its judgments in the two appeals of Macrossan v Comptroller General and Aerotel Ltd v Telco Holdings Ltd and others. [read post]
8 Sep 2006, 9:33 am
Simon Haslam (Abel & Imray) sent the IPKat this item relating to Sisvel's seizure in Germany of allegedly patent-infringing MP3 players made by SanDisk. [read post]
