Search for: "Heald v. Heald"
Results 61 - 80
of 103
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2011, 3:30 am
General Trade and access to medicines: things the WTO should consider (IP Watch) WTO trains officials on TRIPS flexibilities for public health (IP Watch) Coverage of persons living with HIV included in Gilead MPP licenses (KEI) KEI comments on the ITPC Letter to the Medicines Patent Pool Foundation and UNITAID (KEI) UNITAID 3rd consultative forum; nineteen IP recommendations (KEI) A response from the authors of The Health Impact Fund (IP Watch) P J Heald’s latest research… [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 12:29 am
Doomsday, National Geographic-style here Earlier Kat reports on Heald v The Veggie Patent Bashers here and here [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 9:28 am
"Permanent injunctions as punitive damages" in US patent law is Professor Paul Heald's controversial suggestion in a piece which PatLit has spotted here. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 3:55 am
Heald next Wednesday, 23 March, at the London office of Olswang LLP. [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 8:02 am
Heald, 544 U.S. 460 (2005); and North Dakota v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 11:38 am
Heald to protect only direct shipping by producers of wine and by not extending the protection of the dormant Commerce Clause against discriminatory treatment to formally protect all forms of retailing. [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 2:00 am
Heald v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 10:19 am
Heald, and the dormant Commerce Clause can be found in volume 30 issue 2. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 12:36 pm
Heald. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 6:02 am
In 2005, the Supreme Court, in Granholm v. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 7:47 am
” Recall the Supreme Court’s decision in Granholm v. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 12:49 pm
The aim of the law is to largely overturn Granholm v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 3:47 am
Flintshire argued, drawing on the judgment of Lord Hailsham in London & Clydeside States Ltd v Aberdeen DC [1980] WLR 182, that this was at the lower end of the spectrum of procedural defects so as to enable the court to find that Mrs Tyrrell's review was not a nullity. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 3:47 am
Flintshire argued, drawing on the judgment of Lord Hailsham in London & Clydeside States Ltd v Aberdeen DC [1980] WLR 182, that this was at the lower end of the spectrum of procedural defects so as to enable the court to find that Mrs Tyrrell's review was not a nullity. [read post]
14 May 2010, 9:05 am
Heald (2005)). [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 2:19 pm
” MGM v. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 12:00 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: http://duncanbucknell.com/subscribe/ Highlights this week included: Ecuador to define its compulsory licence legislation (IP Watch) (Patently-O) Tavanic (Levofloxacin) – UK: Supreme Court refuses permission to appeal in Generics (UK) Ltd v Daiichi Pharmaceuticals (The SPC Blog) (JIPLP) General Nil: The value of patents in a major crisis such as an influenza pandemic –… [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 2:02 am
De-Winter Heald v Brent London Borough Council; Al-Jarah and Others v Same Court of Appeal “Local authorities were entitled to contract out some or all of the reviews they were required to carry out under the Housing Act 1996. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 2:34 am
De-Winter Heald and others v Brent London Borough Council [2009] EWCA Civ 930; [2009] WLR (D) 289 “Local housing authorities were entitled to contract out some or all of the reviews they were required to carry out under s 202 of the Housing Act 1996. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 9:36 am
The Court of Appeal’s judgment in Heald and others v LB Brent [2009] EWCA Civ 930 is just out concerning the outsourcing of s 202 Housing Act 1996 reviews by Brent to Minos Perdios’ company Housing Reviews Ltd. [read post]
