Search for: "Herring et al v. Moore et al" Results 61 - 80 of 118
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
Note: The parenthetical dates following each author’s name refer to his or her tenure on the Court. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 11:06 pm
Miller, et al    Eastern District of Michigan at DetroitCOBRA; EQUITABLE ESTOPPELBOGGS, Chief Judge. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 10:31 pm
("Zurich") provided insurance coverage to Horizon Natural Resources Co., et al., ("the Debtors") during the pendency of the Debtors' Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 5:11 am
  This week's case under review is Modern Holdings, LLC et al. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 9:39 pm by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
" She concludes that genes should be patentable, but only under a narrow claim scope.Part I is about neither patents nor Bilski: Feldman argues that Moore v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 2:20 pm by Erin Miller
Opinion below (6th Circuit) Petition for certiorari (09-533) Petition for certiorari (09-547) Brief in opposition (09-533/547) Brief in opposition for the federal respondent (09-533/547) Petitioners’ reply (09-533) Petitioners’ reply (09-547) Amicus brief of members of Congress (09-533/547) Amicus brief of American Mosquito Control Association et al. (09-533/547) Amicus brief of Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration Foundation… [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 5:32 pm by Wolfgang Demino
  SHARON EUL et al., on behalf of themselves and a class, Plaintiffs,v.TRANSWORLD SYSTEMS et al., Defendants.No. 15 C 7755.United States District Court, N.D. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 8:47 am by James P. Flynn
Rubin et al., an appellate court in Massachusetts affirmed dismissal of plaintiff’s claims, holding that Agero failed to establish that two of the defendants, Timothy Schneider and Matthew Capozzi, owed Agero a duty of loyalty. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 8:47 am by James (Jim) P. Flynn
Rubin et al., an appellate court in Massachusetts affirmed dismissal of plaintiff’s claims, holding that Agero failed to establish that two of the defendants, Timothy Schneider and Matthew Capozzi, owed Agero a duty of loyalty. [read post]