Search for: "Hervey v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 98
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2010, 10:07 am
Judge Meyers first noted that the State must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that a defendant knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived his Miranda rights. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 7:38 am
Distribution and Marketing, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 9:44 am
This expansion begin in Lands End, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 11:14 am
For example, in Yellow Cab Co. of Sacramento v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 11:14 am
For example, in Yellow Cab Co. of Sacramento v. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 3:42 pm
by Scott Hervey Recently the 7th Circuit in Sunstar, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 7:01 am
Judge Hervey, writing for a seven-judge majority, essentially reproduced a huge chunk of the reporter's record to explain that Grammer had been given the opportunity to present punishment evidence and he never objected to the lack of a separate hearing on punishment. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 2:23 pm
by Scott Hervey This is about a birthday card. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 5:15 am
The court of appeals addressed the issue on state constitutional grounds based on its decision in Pena v. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 5:10 am
Judges Keasler and Hervey dissented without an opinon. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 5:09 am
State and Craven v. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 11:02 am
Judge Hervey, writing for the majority, noted that it was difficult to understand Whitaker's complaint as the plea negotiation testimony made up a significant part of Whitaker's mitigation case. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 5:02 am
Presiding Judge Keller concurred without an opinion along with Judge Hervey. [read post]
13 May 2009, 5:01 am
As in Smith v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 9:53 am
by Scott Hervey It’s been five years since the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board dramatically changed the way Untied States trademark registrations are handled. [read post]
6 May 2009, 5:01 am
Judges Hervey and Cochran dissented without an opinion. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 5:05 am
[This isn't surprising considering Herrera, but one of the Houston courts of appeals flirted with this understanding in a case called Telshow v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 5:02 am
The officer stated as he arrested the protesters that he was arresting them for violation of the tent ordinance. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 5:00 am
I got this case confused with Terry v. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 12:09 pm
The defendant in UMG Recordings, Inc. v. [read post]
