Search for: "Hill v. District Court"
Results 61 - 80
of 2,769
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2015, 3:30 am
In December, virtually the same issue was before the same court, once again by Tower Hill. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 9:53 pm
In Hill v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 9:33 am
Somerset Hills School District: The IDEA prescribes a 2 year statute of limitations. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 4:05 am
In Hill v. [read post]
4 Feb 2017, 6:26 pm
The temporary restraining order (full text) in State of Washington v. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 1:09 pm
Cavender In the case of CH2M Hill Engineers, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 7:31 am
Pam KarlanRick Hills's recent post over at Prawfsblawg on the Supreme Court's decision in Riley v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 7:31 am
Green, 46 F.3d 347, 356 (4th Cir. 1995)(citing Hill, 474 U.S. at 59-60) overruled on other grounds by O’Dell v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 10:28 am
Mango Hill Condominium Association 12, Inc. (3D10-2014), the Third District again reversed a trial court's order compelling appraisal so that the trial court could first determine whether the insured had complied with its post loss obligations. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 5:04 pm
Beverly Hills Unified School District v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 6:33 am
Bethune-Hill; and a reviewability of agency decision case, Smith v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 7:46 am
Editor’s Note: Thanks to the RLUIPA Defense Blog for this post: http://www.rluipa-defense.com/ On March 27, 2015, the Southern District of New York granted summary judgment in favor of all defendants in the consolidated action Bernstein v. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 10:26 pm
Bennett v Hill, 2015 WL 446551 (MT 2/3/2105) The opinion can be accessed at: https://mtlawlibrary.wordpress.com/2015/02/04/opinion-bennett-et-al-v-hill-et-al/Filed under: Current Caselaw, Nuisance Tagged: golf course, spite fence [read post]
11 May 2016, 8:00 am
Uppal v. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 11:14 am
In the Federal Western District Court of Pennsylvania case of Acuity v. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 2:00 am
Federal District Court of Illinois (Central District) lawsuit, the initial question to be answered was whether Wexford’s financial condition could be investigated through discovery; this was answered mostly by the case of Zazu Design v. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 8:00 am
Anita Martin for Marlene Hill v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 3:32 pm
In Johnson v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 10:36 am
The California Court of Appeal, Sixth Appellate District, recently reversed a trial court judgment entered in favor of the City of Morgan Hill pursuant to California's anti-SLAPP statute (Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16.) [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 6:32 pm
In a 74-page opinion filed February 24, and later ordered published on March 17, 2020, the Second District Court of Appeal (Division 7) affirmed judgments (granting the writ petition and awarding fees) in coordinated appeals stemming from a CEQA action successfully challenging the City of Agoura Hills’ (City) project approvals and mitigated negative declaration (MND) for a mixed use development project on an undeveloped 8.2 acre parcel. [read post]
