Search for: "Hoffman v. Wells" Results 61 - 80 of 502
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2012, 9:00 am
The federal district court hearing the case agreed with the ASM to conditional certify the overtime case as a collective action pursuant to the United States Supreme Court case Hoffman v. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 8:06 pm
Well, in what may be a first in US jurisprudence, the brief did not have (steady now) ...an arguments section!! [read post]
9 May 2011, 3:02 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Legal malpractice litigagnts, as well as most other plaintiffs, would like to bring a case where they live. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 9:38 am by Rantanen
Drawing upon the reasoning of a New Jersey district court opinion addressing the same issue, Hoffman-La Roche Inc. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 6:48 am
  There are policy reasons for the rule, and the Louisiana Supreme Court recently laid them out in Hoffman v. 21st Century North Am. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 6:14 am by Rachel Sandler
Hoffman The United States Supreme Court’s decision in TC Heartland jolted the IP law community by displacing long-standing Federal Circuit precedent and leaving a divide amongst district court judges, as well as a bevy of unanswered questions.[1] Since TC Heartland, two more decisions from the U.S. [read post]
15 May 2014, 11:40 am
In striking that balance, it is important to bear in mind that, as Lord Hoffman and Jacob LJ have pointed out, both the patentee and the third party will generally rely on skilled professional advice (and may have a remedy if the advice is incompetent). [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 7:38 am by Brian Cordery
Brian Corderyby Alex Calver Among the flurry of pre-summer vacation judgments coming from the Patents Court is one from Mr Justice Birss (17 July 2019), concerning the validity of Hoffman-La Roche’s patent EP (UK) 2 007 809. [read post]