Search for: "Holder v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 4,249
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
Citizens United v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 2:48 pm
§ 2401(a) of the United States Code generally requires that the complaint to commence such an action must be “filed within six-years after the right of action accrues. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm
John Mikhail, Georgetown Law, has a post up on Balkinization entitled A Reality Check on "Officers of the United States" at the Founding, in which he draws upon the research he conducted on the phrase in connection with his study of the Necessary and Proper Clause. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:04 am
Trump-v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 6:47 am
This term, for instance, the Supreme Court is also considering the meaning of “accrues” in the context of suing the United States government in a case known as Corner Post, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:13 pm
Then, in Lexmark v. [read post]
SCOTUS Ducking the Trump Eligibility Question Now will Pressure the Court to Rule in his Favor Later
16 Feb 2024, 7:56 am
Term Limits, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:48 pm
The first installment focused on Justice Gorsuch's colloquies about Officers of the United States. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 12:46 pm
On Thursday, Februrary 8, I sat in the courtroom of the Supreme Court of the United States on assignment for JURIST to hear oral arguments in Trump v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
Lash's response to the Amar brothers' amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
The state courts, for example, are not trying to enjoin Donald Trump from taking office. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 12:08 pm
Miniard 23-444Issue: Whether, when counsel is physically present, state action is required before a court may find a complete denial of counsel under United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
For present purposes, however, the important point to understand is that Trump’s primary merits argument, to which he devotes the first 13 pages of the Argument section of his brief (pp. 20-33), concerns only the second, middle “Officials Clause,” which identifies the current and former office-holders to whom Section 3 potentially applies, rather than the government positions that an insurrectionist or rebel is ineligible to occupy going forward. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:39 pm
Cir. 2012) (quoting United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 4:34 pm
By: Mayel Tapia-Fregoso In the United States, copyright law protects original works of authorship that are fixed in a tangible medium. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 6:16 am
In United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 12:33 pm
by Dennis Crouch In Roku, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
” In the United States applicants may use a terminal disclaimers to “obviate judicially created double patenting” by disclaiming any a portion of the term of a patent and confirming that the patent will be commonly owned with the second patent – see MPEP s1490. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 11:47 am
” ( See Brownell v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 7:56 pm
Holder, 556 U.S. 418 (2009). [read post]
