Search for: "Holder v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 4,251
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2024, 7:48 am by John Coyle
In 2019, the United States recognized Venezuela’s Interim President Juan Guaidó as the lawful head of state. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 2:48 pm by Daniel M. Kowalski
§ 2401(a) of the United States Code generally requires that the complaint to commence such an action must be “filed within six-years after the right of action accrues. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
John Mikhail, Georgetown Law, has a post up on Balkinization entitled A Reality Check on "Officers of the United States" at the Founding, in which he draws upon the research he conducted on the phrase in connection with his study of the Necessary and Proper Clause. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 6:47 am by Dennis Crouch
This term, for instance, the Supreme Court is also considering the meaning of “accrues” in the context of suing the United States government in a case known as Corner Post, Inc. v. [read post]
  On Thursday, Februrary 8, I sat in the courtroom of the Supreme Court of the United States on assignment for JURIST to hear oral arguments in Trump v. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 12:08 pm by Kalvis Golde
Miniard 23-444Issue: Whether, when counsel is physically present, state action is required before a court may find a complete denial of counsel under United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
  For present purposes, however, the important point to understand is that Trump’s primary merits argument, to which he devotes the first 13 pages of the Argument section of his brief (pp. 20-33), concerns only the second, middle “Officials Clause,” which identifies the current and former office-holders to whom Section 3 potentially applies, rather than the government positions that an insurrectionist or rebel is ineligible to occupy going forward. [read post]
By: Mayel Tapia-Fregoso In the United States, copyright law protects original works of authorship that are fixed in a tangible medium. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 4:00 am by Alan Macek
” In the United States applicants may use a terminal disclaimers to “obviate judicially created double patenting” by disclaiming any a portion of the term of a patent and confirming that the patent will be commonly owned with the second patent – see MPEP s1490. [read post]