Search for: "Holland v. Miller" Results 61 - 80 of 84
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2010, 1:40 am
Case New Holland, Inc., 566 F.3d 1372, 1375 (Fed. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Miller (Lewis and Clark), Judith V. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 10:36 pm
In a review of Campylobacter outbreaks in 10 different countries from 1978 to 2002, Miller and Mandrell (2005) identified only 5 outbreaks traced to pasteurized or heat-treat milk compared with 68 outbreaks from consumption of raw dairy products. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 5:55 am
Part 1 and part 2 of this series examined the historical context of the debate surrounding dairy product food safety, and the mechanisms by which pasteurized or raw dairy products may become contaminated with foodborne pathogens. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 8:25 am
And:For example, it was this Texas appeals court that directly and deliberately defied the Justices in Miller-El v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 11:22 am by velvel
June 11, 2009Re: Irving Picard’s Three Percent Commission In The Madoff Case. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 3:57 am
Renteria, No. 99,309 (Feb. 27, 2009); Michael Holland II; affirming Judge Rome's dismissal based on statutory speedy trial.State v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 10:30 am
This is the court, remember, that directly and deliberately defied the United States Supreme Court in Miller-El v. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 9:00 pm
Ice Miller Blog-Proud Ice Miller's blogs are listed directly on the home page. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 2:00 pm
  On Tuesday, August 19, 2008, PropertyShark.com is sponsoring a Manhattan real-estate networking event at The Madison & Gypsy Tea (27 West 24th Street). [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 1:09 pm
Miller, No. 06-11078 A conviction for tax evasion is affirmed where: 1) sufficient evidence supported the jury's verdict; 2) there was no abuse of discretion in various evidentiary rulings by the district court; 3) a claim the indictment was duplicitous failed as defendant was not prejudiced; and 4) a Brady claim failed as the cumulative effect of the suppressed evidence at issue did not undermine confidence in the verdict. [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 10:04 am
For publication opinions today (2): In Johnny Melvin Holland v. [read post]