Search for: "Holland v. State of Florida*" Results 61 - 80 of 177
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2010, 7:35 am by Kent Scheidegger
McNeil, No. 09-11051, to reconsider in light of Holland v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 10:43 pm by cdw
This  week’s edition is now available: The Supreme Court’s holding in Albert Holland v. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 11:01 am by John Pfaff
Adam Liptak has a depressing piece up in today's New York Times about how states are respodning to the Supreme Court's decision in Graham v Florida, which declared life without parole sentences for minors unconstitutional. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 7:39 am by GiovannaShay
  However, courts have sometimes noted egregious attorney misconduct, on the part of both defense counsel (Holland v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 6:35 am by Erin Miller
– The Court will hear argument in Holland v. [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 1:16 pm by Anna Christensen
Thompkins, by Harvard Law School’s Ray Seilie, and a recap of Holland v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 7:26 am by Conor McEvily
” Finally, Joan Biskupic of the USA Today previews next week’s argument in United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 2:40 am by SHG
This was the situation that Albert Holland placed at the doorstep of the Supreme Court in Holland v. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 7:52 am by Richard Gershon
When he left the Attorney General's office, he  practiced law with the firm of Holland, Bevis & Smith, now Holland & Knight. [read post]
6 May 2016, 12:30 pm
Wyeth Laboratories, 498 F.2d 1264, 1273-74 (5th Cir. 1974) (applying unavoidably unsafe standard without individualized assessment); Holland v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 9:48 am by Lyle Denniston
**  A request for the Court to clarify the doctrine that a suing party generally can be excused for having missed a filing deadline if it would be unfair to enforce the deadline — a concept that the Court laid down in the 2010 decision in Holland v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 1:15 pm by Jason Mazzone
Instead, I predict a “sympathy” per curiam, in which the Court will squeezes Maples’s plight into Holland v. [read post]