Search for: "Hood v. United States District Court"
Results 61 - 80
of 154
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2015, 3:00 am
Hood v. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 7:39 am
The general contractor filed an appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in the form of what was called a Petition for Writ of Mandamus in an attempt to reverse the trial court's ruling. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 7:09 pm
When the Court heard argument in November in Sandifer v. [read post]
11 May 2009, 2:27 pm
Wisconsin Court of Appeals, District IV: State of Wisconsin v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 7:44 am
” In the wake of the Court’s recent decision in United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 5:16 am
The Branch Consultants v. [read post]
4 May 2017, 8:34 am
” For this claim, Jawad relied on United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 8:10 am
United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, Case No 12-929 (December 3, 2013), the Supremes weighed in on the enforceability of forum selection clauses . . . and their decision . . . was music to the ears of large general contractors. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 12:34 pm
Now, the Center for Individual Rights — an excellent public interest law firm, for which I’m an unpaid legal adviser — is challenging the Massachusetts stun gun ban in federal district court, in Martel v. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 1:59 am
"It was this section of the United States Constitution - the Interstate Commerce Clause - that as recently as this week tripped up an Amish dairy farmer who was legally milking cows in Pennsylvania, but selling illegally the District of Columbia and its Maryland suburbs.But issues surrounding the Interstate Commerce Clause have spilled over to affect more than just raw milk since the time the Constitution was ratified. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 1:03 am
United States, et al. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 12:13 am
The United States as intervenor and amicus supports the position of the Holy See with respect to the Holy See's status as a foreign state and the constitutionality of the FSIA. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 6:47 pm
Pursuant to the United States Supreme Court in Strickland v. [read post]
23 Dec 2018, 12:35 pm
In United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 10:53 am
In Gersh v. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 6:47 pm
Pursuant to the United States Supreme Court in Strickland v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 3:33 am
The 6th District concludes that this issue was resolved in State v. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 9:49 am
The district court engaged in a detailed discussion of the various elements arising under relevant state law in order to examine whether the doctor was acting within the scope of her federal employment. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 12:24 pm
It is commonplace in employment litigation to learn that a charge by a single employee of a discrete violation of law has become the basis for broad and far reaching requests for information and documents or that the EEOC has filed a complaint for hundreds of employees it has not even considered in its investigation or in its attempts at statutory conciliation.Despite precedents that give wide berth to the EEOC on investigative subpoenas, the United States District… [read post]
