Search for: "Hooks v. Obama" Results 61 - 80 of 95
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2016, 12:03 pm by Michael Lowe
So, expect to be hearing lots more about federal funding to help people hooked on heroin here in North Texas. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 11:28 am by msatta
His antitrust opinions, certain other competition matters, and a closely related dispute over the Obama net neutrality rule betray an ideological, anti-regulatory activist, willing to take bits and pieces of precedent and use them to change the law as he likes. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 11:39 am
President-elect Obama is perfectly positioned to make this restoration a central part of his legal agenda. [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 6:05 am by Joseph Margulies
Habib, who is Australian, had been one of the four petitioners in Rasul v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 3:00 am by Steve Lombardi
Krakauer and President Obama donated what appears to be $175,000 combined donations to this org. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 9:08 pm
 Well, one answer might be that the Justices want to be taken off the hook. [read post]
17 Dec 2012, 7:49 am by Charon QC
Among the dead were 20 children from Sandy Hook Elementary School aged between 5 and 10, including 6 year-old Dylan Hockley whose family had immigrated to the US from Eastleigh, Hampshire in 2011. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Patent Prospector) (Patent Docs) (Patent Baristas) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Law360) (BLOG@IP::JUR) (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Techdirt) (Hal Wegner) Reactions to Patent Reform Bill 2009 (IP Watchdog) (Patent Baristas) (IP Watchdog) (IP Watchdog) (Patently-O)    Global Global - General World IP Day, 26 April, approaching (IPKat)   Global -… [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 3:02 pm by azatty
In United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 9:13 am by Kashmir Hill
The NIH and the DOJ need to hook up. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 6:25 am
(As I noted above, the Court could still expand on its ruling, but to do so, they will have to rewrite yet more history, because so far, they have relied on home protection as their hook.)The second difference between the two cases is, again, sheer speed. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
The Panopticon Blog has covered the case of Stunt v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 1780. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  As Franks’ book was going to press, the Supreme Court granted cert in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 11:03 am by Keith Gerver
The afternoon session of Day 2 of the conference begins with introductory remarks from Gabby Blum, the moderator of the afternoon’s first panel. [read post]