Search for: "Hooper v. Hooper"
Results 61 - 80
of 243
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2019, 6:11 am
Hadley Baker shared appellate briefs from both parties in Trump v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 10:33 am
(Indian Child Welfare Act) Manuel Corralles, Jr., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 10:22 am
Nagle v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 1:42 pm
Department of Interior (Tribal Sovereign Immunity; Internal Affairs of Tribes) Hooper v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 9:25 am
Leung; Trying to see the wood despite the trees: a plain approach to legal translation, Víctor González-Ruiz; Minimal unit of legal translation vs. minimal unit of thought, Svetlana V. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 9:44 am
In the years after the Court of Appeals decision in Stith three of the four Appellate Departments have issued rulings counter to the Stith holding, concluding that because it is the defendant's initial burden to establish standing, the People may raise defendant's lack of standing for the first time on appeal (see People v McCall, 51 AD3d 822, 822 [2d Dept 2008] lv denied 11 NY3d 856 [2008]; People v Hooper, 245 AD2d 1020, 1021 [4th Dept 1997]; People v… [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 1:03 pm
Britton v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 11:36 am
As explained in Hooper v. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 9:09 am
Wainwright and Panetti v. [read post]
2 Mar 2007, 3:21 am
Hooper, of Hooper Law Offices, PC, Riverton, Wyoming; Tom A. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 9:43 am
Finally, on 3 April 2012, the Court of Appeal (Maurice Kay and Hooper LJJ and Henderson J) dismissed the appeal by the defendant in the case of Bento v Chief Constable of Bedfordshire. [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 4:00 am
" Citing Hooper Assoc. v AGS Computers, 74 N.Y.2d 487, the Appellate Division noted that the language of the Employer's internal resolution was ambiguous, and opined that "This ambiguity itself precludes a finding of entitlement to contractual indemnification" as [1] the resolution does not convey a clear right to indemnification and [2] Plaintiff was ordered to pay restitution in connection with a guilty plea to disorderly conduct in satisfaction of an… [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 4:00 am
" Citing Hooper Assoc. v AGS Computers, 74 N.Y.2d 487, the Appellate Division noted that the language of the Employer's internal resolution was ambiguous, and opined that "This ambiguity itself precludes a finding of entitlement to contractual indemnification" as [1] the resolution does not convey a clear right to indemnification and [2] Plaintiff was ordered to pay restitution in connection with a guilty plea to disorderly conduct in satisfaction of an… [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 4:00 am
" Citing Hooper Assoc. v AGS Computers, 74 N.Y.2d 487, the Appellate Division noted that the language of the Employer's internal resolution was ambiguous, and opined that "This ambiguity itself precludes a finding of entitlement to contractual indemnification" as [1] the resolution does not convey a clear right to indemnification and [2] Plaintiff was ordered to pay restitution in connection with a guilty plea to disorderly conduct in satisfaction of an… [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 4:00 am
" Citing Hooper Assoc. v AGS Computers, 74 N.Y.2d 487, the Appellate Division noted that the language of the Employer's internal resolution was ambiguous, and opined that "This ambiguity itself precludes a finding of entitlement to contractual indemnification" as [1] the resolution does not convey a clear right to indemnification and [2] Plaintiff was ordered to pay restitution in connection with a guilty plea to disorderly conduct in satisfaction of an… [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 10:04 am
The defence of fair comment was last considered by the House of Lords in Telnikoff v Matusevitch ([1992] 2 AC 343). [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 3:48 pm
The goods were taken in a van which was not Mr Hooper's. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 8:44 am
Up until this case, that position had support in domestic law (see AL (Serbia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 42, [2008] 4 All ER 1127; R (Hooper) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2005] UKHL 29, [2006] 1 All ER 487; and R (S) v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire [2004] UKHL 39, [2004] 4 All ER 193). [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 7:49 am
Robert Hooper, Defendant-Appellant.2008 WL 426511(N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 7:49 am
Robert Hooper, Defendant-Appellant.2008 WL 426511(N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept. [read post]
