Search for: "Hoos v. Hoos"
Results 61 - 80
of 87
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2010, 2:05 am
(PatLit) Judgment of similarity of designs in China (Class 99) Denmark When toilet seats make impressions on their users: Duravit AG v B&N Developing ApS (Class 99) Europe European patent – Further steps to enhanced cooperation (EPLAW) (IPJUR) (IPKat) (inovia) (IAM) General Court: More absolute grounds: KOMPRESSOR PLUS (Class 46) General Court confirms likelihood of confusion: Bianchin v OHMI – Grotto (GASOLINE) (Class 46) General Court finds HALLUX descriptive for… [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 11:48 pm
Otten (EPLAW) Non-infringement case: Safeway v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 2:59 am
Boo freaking hoo. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 3:33 am
” Well, boo-hoo. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 6:46 am
One of the cases that we examined was United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 5:11 am
The first decision -- Werberl v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 6:50 am
I haven't had the slightest bit of interest in the NBA since ... well, not too long after I drank my last Yoo-Hoo. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 10:56 am
Tomislav V. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 4:31 pm
In substance, Arnold J said no [the IPKat says, this is consonant with the position recently taken by the General Court with regard to appeals against successful rulings in invalidity proceedings in Case T-300/08 Hoo Hing Holdings Ltd v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Tresplain Investments Ltd]. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 8:15 am
Poor Lauren McClusky. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 12:38 pm
Chan Chun Hoo Thomas, delivered in September last year. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 5:39 am
Woo-hoo! [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 12:39 am
Wasabi Frog Ltd v Miss Boo Ltd [2009] EWHC 2767 (Ch) Lid dip: Peter A Clarke [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 9:02 pm
Gates v. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 6:20 pm
Woo-hoo! [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 4:30 am
Frye v. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 3:56 am
Last week's decision in the case of Pleasant Grove City v. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 6:25 pm
Two more amicus briefs in the "ceded lands" case, Hawaii v. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 6:20 am
has ordered the DOJ and OLC to side with the defense in Jose Padilla v. [read post]
