Search for: "Hope v. Trump et al"
Results 61 - 80
of 81
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Aug 2023, 6:22 pm
Dec. 6, 2022); see also Horwin v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
(IP Dragon) Patent strategies for foreign R&D work in China (Philip Brooks' Patent Infringement Updates) All clichés but still true: Intellectual Property Rights enforcement in China leaves room for improvement (IP Dragon) Recognition and protection of well-known trade marks (International Law Office) Revised Chinese patent law aims at quality, compulsory licensing (Intellectual Property Watch) Zen and the art of intellectual property in China (IP Dragon) Colombia… [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 10:27 am
., GMA, et al. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 10:27 am
., GMA, et al. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 11:00 pm
“Tool Without A Handle: A Duty of Candor” The law and legal professional ethics require of counsel a duty of candor in the practice of law.[1] This includes a duty to not knowingly make false statements of fact, to not conceal controlling legal authority, and to not offer evidence the lawyer knows to be false.[2] These principles are considered essential to maintaining both substantive fairness for participants in the process, and trust in the integrity of the process for… [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 4:58 pm
By focusing on expressive core of internet, we hope to restrain any libertarian vision. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
Protecting computer programs under the Copyright Act: Dais Studios v Bullet Creative: (IP Down Under), Assessing copyright risk in new classroom technologies: (IP Down Under), Cadbury loses battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), (IP Down Under), (IPKat), (IPwar’s), Employee or independent contractor? [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
[Editor’s Note: This post is based on a comment letter submitted to the U.S. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 2:45 am
Varsity Brands, Inc, et al. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 3:57 am
The book also offers a reading of Lawrence v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 1:32 pm
ATT Mobility, et al. [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 9:03 am
" Marbury v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 10:58 am
This is a guest post from law professor Michael Trebilcock and lawyer Dan Poliwoda: THE TRIPS VACCINE WAIVER CONTROVERSY* By Michael Trebilcock Emeritus University Professor of LawUniversity of Toronto Dan Poliwoda Lawyer, Dickinson Wright LLP University of Toronto (J.D., 2020) July 12, 2021 *We acknowledge the invaluable research assistance of Daniel Scarpitti, University of Toronto, Faculty of Law, 2L, in preparing these comments. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 4:38 pm
Courts of Appeal after Blakely v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 2:16 pm
USA LLC, et al. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 4:04 pm
See Ariel Katz’s “game theory” analysis in his blog.I have been provided with a copy of a very interesting and widely distributed email dated April 16, 2012 (the date the agreement was announced) that was sent to presidents of Canadian universities et al by Paul Davidson, President of AUCC. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 6:30 am
Sullivan who would gladly have bankrupted the New York Times in a trumped-up defamation suit. [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 11:14 am
However, hope that we can get more consensus by going to empirical claims is probably futile, as Dan Kahan et al have said in many other legal contexts. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 2:12 pm
Cannon to right of them, Cannon to left of them, Cannon in front of them Volley’d & thunder’d; Storm’d at with shot and shell, Boldly they rode and well, Into the jaws of Death, Into the mouth of Hell Rode the six hundred [Blawg Review 141 was published slightly early after email exchange between myself and Ed of Blawg Review] Welcome Bienvenu Wilkommen Benvenuto Bienvenido to Blawg Review 141. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 4:58 am
Key Findings In December 2017, Congress passed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), arguably the most significant piece of tax legislation in three decades. [read post]
