Search for: "Howard v. State of California" Results 61 - 80 of 524
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2017, 3:47 pm by Native American Rights Fund
Great Plains Lending, LLC (Tribal Sovereign Immunity)California Valley Miwok Tribe v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 11:57 am by Cormac Early
Perry and United States v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 4:06 am by Edith Roberts
Richard Re analyzes Monday’s opinion in Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 2:42 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which it will consider whether last Term’s decision in Johnson v. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 12:33 pm by Unknown
Hansen (Religious Freedom; Free Exercise Clause) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2021.htmlScudero v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
SB 1272 submits the following question (designated by the California Secretary of State as Proposition 49) to the California electorate for its input: Shall the Congress of the United States propose, and the California Legislature ratify, an amendment or amendments to the United States Constitution to overturn Citizens United v. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
After a lunch break, the justices will reconvene to hear argument in California Public Employees’ Retirement System v. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 7:36 am by Erwin Chemerinsky and Howard Gillman
Howard Gillman is the chancellor and a professor of political science and law at University of California, Irvine. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 8:08 am by Allison Trzop
Perry, in which the Court held that the sponsors of California’s ban on same-sex marriage lacked standing to defend the initiative on appeal, and United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 6:42 am by Ben
., the California-based company whose principals are Turtles vocalists Mark Volman and Howard Kaylan, filed the lawsuit in 2013 alleging copyright infringement involving music made prior to 1972. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 5:49 am
”  More recently, the Tenth Circuit, in United States v. [read post]