Search for: "Hughes v. Heard"
Results 61 - 80
of 476
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2011, 3:55 am
Background The application was heard on Tuesday 11 January 2011. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 4:10 pm
In the case of Ewing v Crown Court sitting at Cardiff and Newport ([2016] EWHC 183 (Admin)) confirms an important feature of the open justice principle: that permission is not needed in order to take notes in Court. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 5:03 am
You can read the full opinion for EEOC v. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 6:33 am
The appeal was heard on 4 and 5 May 2017 and judgment was handed down on 4 October 2017. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 6:06 am
Her position was “directly comparable” to that of the claimants in Gorry v Wiltshire County Council (heard alongside Burnip). [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 2:55 am
The justices that heard the case are Lady Hale and Lords Kerr, Wilson, Hughes and Hodge. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 2:55 am
The justices that heard the case are Lady Hale and Lords Kerr, Wilson, Hughes and Hodge. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 7:10 am
In last week’s case (R.G. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 8:34 am
The US Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 6:28 am
Since statute is silent and Parliament has not defined the meaning of “precarious”, Lords Wilson, Carnwath, Hughes, Lloyd-Jones and Lady Black heard rival arguments about the correct construction of the term within the meaning of the Strasbourg jurisprudence. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 7:28 am
In brief, the case of R v Egan [1992] 4 All ER 470 had stated (without the court having heard full argument) that the previous case of R v Lloyd [1967] 1 QB 175 legitimised two approaches to defining ‘substantial’ in the context of diminished responsibility. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 1:45 am
They did not dissent as they recognised that they were in the minority and the pure happenstance that Lord Kerr died after completion of the judgments, but just before they could be handed down, should not mean that the case has to be re-heard due to an evenly divided panel. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 2:06 pm
Appling, in which the court heard argument yesterday. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 5:41 am
On Wednesday 7 March 2012, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights heard the application in the Article 10 case of Animal Defenders International v United Kingdom. [read post]
2 Aug 2020, 11:31 am
Ever heard of a “portmanteau” word? [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 4:57 pm
On 9 February 2018, Nicklin J heard an application in the case of JMO v KTA. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 9:00 am
(On the injunction issue, the Prothonotary’s recent written directions as to scheduling and hearing Abbott’s motion for a post trial injunction in May 2014 were recently “converted” to an Order and appealed by Janssen to be heard by Justice Hughes.) [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 2:02 am
The Advocate General representing the Commissioners of HMRC v K E Entertainments Ltd (Scotland), heard 29 April 2020 Stoffel & Co v Grondona, heard 5 May 2020 Ecila Henderson (A Protected Party, by her litigation friend, The Official Solicitor) v Dorset Healthcare Trust, heard Monday 11- Tuesday 12 May 2020 Mastercard Incorporated & Ors v Walter Hugh Merricks CBE, heard Wednesday 13- Thursday 14 May 2020 AP… [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 9:14 am
In the matter of an application by Hugh Jordan for Judicial Review (NI) was heard 23 October 2018. [read post]
13 May 2020, 1:02 am
This is a live blog of the appeal brought by Mastercard concerning class certification under the UK’s collective action regime introduced by the Consumer Rights Act 2015. [read post]
