Search for: "Huntley v. Huntley" Results 61 - 80 of 85
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2010, 6:33 pm
The Commonwealth Court rejected all challenges to the act applying the reasoning of the Pa Supreme Court in Huntley & Huntley, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 5:19 pm by James Eckert
In People v McClean, decided June 10th, the Court of Appeals held that, while right to counsel deprivations are normally reviewable even in the absence of an objection, the record must be clear that there was a deprivation, so a form of preservation requirement sneaks in through the back door. [read post]
11 May 2010, 2:57 am by traceydennis
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Huntley & Anor v Armes [2010] EWCA Civ 396 (11 May 2010) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Crown Prosecution Service v Neish [2010] EWCA Crim 1011 (06 May 2010) High Court (Administrative Court) Ahmed & Ors v Murphy [2010] EWHC 453 (Admin) (10 May 2010) High Court (Family Division) PM v KH & Anor [2010] EWHC 870 (Fam) (30 April 2010) Source: www.bailii.org [read post]
7 Mar 2010, 4:00 pm by James Eckert
In my opinion, and here's the shiny object in the weeds that I wanted to get to, the People have a burden under People v Huntley (15 NY2d 72 [1965]) to establish that the statement is voluntary before it can be admitted:"the jury passes on voluntariness only after the judge has fully and independently resolved the issue against the accused’ and has made express findings upon the disputed fact question of voluntariness. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 3:52 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Curtis v R [2010] EWCA Crim 123 (09 February 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) O’Beirne v Hudson [2010] EWCA Civ 52 (09 February 2010) Drew v Whitbread [2010] EWCA Civ 53 (09 February 2010) B, R (on the application of) v Cornwall Council & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 55 (09 February 2010) W (Children), Re [2010] EWCA Civ 57 (09 February 2010) Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences Inc [2010] EWCA Civ 33 (09… [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 1:41 am
DISTRICT COURTEASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKConsumer Protection Class Not Certified in FDCPA Lawsuit; No Evidence Others Received Threatening Debt Collection Calls Huntley v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 5:34 am
After motions were made by the defendant's counsel, a Huntley Hearing (a hearing where a judge determines the admissibility of a defendant's statement) was ordered and conducted. [read post]
4 May 2009, 1:57 am
Last Act: 04/27/09 REFERRED TO CIVIL SERVICE & PENSIONSS4902 HUNTLEY -- Creates mental health incident review panels Same as A 6835 BLURB : Men Hyg. incident review panels Last Act: 04/27/09 REFERRED TO MENT [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 2:02 am
 A2596 Markey (MS) -- Extends the statute of limitations in criminal and civil actions for certain sex offenses committed against a child less than eighteen years of age Same as S 2568 Last Act: 03/19/09 advanced to third reading cal.262A4110 Brodsky (MS) -- Requires disclosure of environmental conservation permit applicant's record of compliance with state, federal, and foreign environmental regulations No Same asLast Act: 03/19/09 advanced to third… [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 1:49 am
 A2596 Markey (MS) -- Extends the statute of limitations in criminal and civil actions for certain sex offenses committed against a child less than eighteen years of age Same as S 2568 BLURB : CP L. crtn sex crimes st of lmtnsLast Act: 03/19/09 advanced to third reading cal.262A5708A Lopez V (MS) -- Relates to the timeliness of commencing certain civil actions related to sex offenses No Same asBLURB : CP L. infancy statutes of limitatLast Act:… [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 3:14 am
High Court (Chancery Division) Tann v Herrington [2009] EWHC 445 (Ch) (10 March 2009) High Court (Queen’s Bench) Huntley v Simmonds [2009] EWHC 406 (QB) (05 March 2009) Al Jedda v Secretary of State for Defence [2009] EWHC 397 (QB) (05 March 2009) Huntley v Simmonds [2009] EWHC 405 (QB) (13 February 2009) High Court (Family Division) K v K [2008] EWHC [...] [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 10:39 pm
In this case, it was Hirst v UK (No2). [read post]
7 Jun 2008, 6:38 pm
This, coupled with Johnson's knowledge of defendant's recidivist history, previous parole violation and illegal drug use, possession and sales, was sufficient to provide the requisite individualized reasonable suspicion to support the search of defendant's home and the seizure of the drugs and related items found there (see Florida v J.L., 529 U.S. at 270-271; United States v Muhammad, 463 F3d at 121; People v Huntley, 43 NY2d at 181-182). [read post]